1 - 10 Next
In response to:

'Me Too' Republicans

Donna450 Wrote: Mar 27, 2013 11:35 AM
I would prefer if both parties--if there truly is a Democratic Party still in existence--would reach out to the human race and cease playing race politics. We are a very diverse nation of people, so race should never enter the conversation. We need to be treated as one, instead of separated into groups--especially when our rights are being considered. Personally, I don't believe the American people have any rights left. The elitist have decided they know what's best and we don't need to bother them with our opinions.
In response to:

Intellectuals and Race

Donna450 Wrote: Mar 12, 2013 10:13 AM
Too many people fail because they believe an education is given. An education must be earned, like anything else worth having or complishing. If an IQ indicates anything, it is that you were willing to read and learn, not that you were born genetically more intelligent. The color of a person's skin does not determine their ability to learn, however, every race on earth has those who attempt to improve themselves, their education, and their situation, and those who believe it must be given to them. Sadly, the ideology that taking is the way to succeed came with the great liberal enlightenment. So much for earning an education...
In response to:

Sore Loser? Darned Straight

Donna450 Wrote: Nov 09, 2012 11:53 AM
Darwin was half right. Conservatives were made in the image of God. Liberals were the slugs that slimed out of the ooze pool and "evolved." They haven't made it to the higher thinking stage yet. When they change the ethnicity on the census, they should only have two; Human or Liberal.
I now know, thanks to the MSM, that the words "Chicago and Basketball" are racial code. Silly me, I thought Chicago was a city in the United States and basketball was a game. I had no idea...it's gotten ridiculous!!
There is just too-much irony in liberals (with their big government ideas) calling Republicans/conservatives liars and Nazis. Hitler used class-warfare and racial divide to gain his position as Germany's leader and that is exactly what Obama has done. If anyone can find a man more capable of lying than Barack Obama, we all need to see him, because the majority of conservatives in this country today are convinced that if Barry's mouth is open, he's lying.
Obama told his advisers to find him a business that never had problems regardless of the economy, and they found the paving industry. That's right, Obama stimulated an industry that didn't need stimulating, but he forgot to find out the particulars. There are very few "shovel ready jobs" in the paving industry and the only economy he stimulated was Mexico's, as most of the road crews are extremely well-paid green card carriers. You won't get wealthy working a road crew, but you will make a good deal more than minimum wage. So, the lesson learned; the only people Obama has helped have been more Mexicans while treating citizens (whites, blacks, Hispanics, etc) like second class citizens.
In response to:

'Bait and Switch' Taxes

Donna450 Wrote: Sep 05, 2012 8:42 AM
As I recall, according to a report done approximately 4-years ago now, if Obama redistributed the wealth evenly, each of us would live off $14-thousand annually. I don't know about anyone else, but that would leave us owing on monthly bills probably within the first six months. We would be actively hunting those poor little Bambi's the liberals are so fond of protecting.
In response to:

A Political Glossary

Donna450 Wrote: Jun 26, 2012 8:45 AM
Merriam Webster's Dictionary obviously needs a re-do due to politicians and their words. The words "hope, change, and transparency" have definitely "evolved."
In response to:

Immoral Beyond Redemption

Donna450 Wrote: Jun 06, 2012 8:54 AM
The only objection I have to any of this would be that Social Security is taken from the victim of a crime by the government, spent helter skelter, and then has to be taken from another victim. Social security, if it were privatized, would do what it is supposed to do, but it is taken from Victim A, redistributed to whatever cause he government sees fit, and then taken again from Victim B to pay back what was taken from Victim A. We don't have choice, so we pay into a social security and then are told it's not our money.
In response to:

Good Economists

Donna450 Wrote: Apr 18, 2012 8:24 AM
Sirden, we have 49-percent of Americans who pay nothing. The wealthy earn their money, as do middle-class and they pay between 25 and 50-percent of their income dependent upon how the money is made. What is a fair-share? Think carefully before answering this, because tax on the middle-class, according to figures, would be $3-trillion as opposed to the $700-billion that would be made from making the "wealthy" pay their fair share.
1 - 10 Next