In response to:

Scouts Flirt with Dishonor and Destruction

DonMann Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 1:04 PM
I would not want my Son or Daughter to be lead by some limp wrested feminine male or manly he/she female.. I do not think that they would be a good roles that my children should be exposed too. The Scouts should not cave in on this issue. What the hell is happening to our country?
Cambermeister Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 2:00 PM
Decisions about children are being made by the childless DonMann.
DonMann Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 2:28 PM
@Jack, I am straight forward and if NOT wanting my Son around gays is being a bigot, then so be it. I do not support their perversion in anyway. My beliefs, my way.. Anytime the Govt has to put a protective order to keep your ilk form being jacked up, then there's something wrong. WE DO NOT support you. Deal with it!!

I have a Great Son!! And Thank God, he's normal!! Get my drift, NORMAL!!
DCM in FL Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 3:05 PM
"Yes, not wanting your son to be around gays makes you a bigot."
No, it doesn't.

"Also a hopeless failure because it's inevitable."
Unfortunately, it may be.

"Not sure why you think I am gay."
I don't know why he would either. By no means are defenders of homosexuality "gay" themselves. In fact, some of its best defenders are people who aren't "gay" and therefore don't really know much about homosexuality (as opposed to "gays" who are in denial or knowingly misrepresent it).
Jack2894 Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 3:14 PM
Yes it does make him a bigot, just as not wanting his son to be around black people, those with cancer, Indians, Philadelphians, Russians, Scientists or any other grouping would make him a bigot.

I hope that his very NORMAL son can manage to function in a world where gay men do not feel obligated to hide their sexuality, especially if someone important in his adult life, such as a teacher,mentor or boss, turns out to be gay.

DonMann Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 3:16 PM
Like I said before. I do not support the homos being around young boys and men and that makes me a bigot, then so be it. My Son, is grown and is NORMAL. As far as me saying that you gay, I said that I do not support you. Then that would mean your ideology.
Anominus Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 3:20 PM
Not wanting your kids around a homosodomite is the same as not wanting them around a beaver during a rabies outbreak. I guess not exactly the same - the beaver doesn't have control over its behavior - a homosodomite pedophile chooses to abuse his victims. It has nothing to do with bigotry - just a common sense desire to protect children from harm.
Jack2894 Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 3:34 PM
WHat you are trying to protect them from is your own fear.
Anominus Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 3:43 PM
Yep, a justified fear, given the evidence.
DCM in FL Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 3:43 PM
"Yes it does make him a bigot, just as not wanting his son to be around black people, those with cancer, Indians, Philadelphians, Russians, Scientists or any other grouping would make him a bigot."

Any other grouping? Like, say, pedophiles? That's a grouping, and it has far more in common with homosexuality than any of the ones you name.

Homosexuality ain't a physical condition, an ethnicity, or a profession. It's an unnatural and unhealthy behaviorial issue. False analogies won't change that.

Jack2894 Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 3:57 PM
Sorry DCM, your personal opinion on this topic is of no particular importance. Its not unnatural because nothing that occurs in every culture and every time in history can be considered unnatural. Inappropriate sexual behavior can be a behavioral issue, but that is certainly not limited to gay folk.
Anominus Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 4:10 PM
"Its not unnatural because nothing that occurs in every culture and every time in history can be considered unnatural."

Just because something is "natural" it doesn't mean it's healthy. Human sacrifice was practiced in every culture throughout history - does that mean we should embrace it as well? (Oh wait... Liberals do embrace human sacrifice - abortion for the sake of convenience.)
Jack2894 Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 4:32 PM
Aside from the fact that you are wrong about human culture, I agree with you. Something being natural does not make it good and somethign being unnatural does not make it bad. I am glad we agree on this. We may as well deal with "normal" as well. Something normal is not necessarily good and some th abnormal is not necessarily something bad. Right?
Anominus Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 4:43 PM
Blah blah blah. More meaningless generalities, Jack@$$. Homosodomy, along with all the other paraphilias, is a proven evil - regardless of whether you consider it normal or not.
JustMC Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 6:25 PM
You and the Taliban have lots in common so far...
pow1000 Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 8:18 PM
Jack you're an idiot. Go ahead put your sons with a gay scoutmaster, maybe even look for one, if it makes you happy. But if we dont want to, we dont have to.
Besides I dont believe you have kids.
pow1000 Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 8:18 PM
Jay Wye Wrote: Feb 06, 2013 8:25 PM
lots of homo men have been married and had children,before they "came out".

Or are you claiming they were not homo,that they only TURNED homo after they were married and had children?

Boy Scouts learn to start fires by rubbing two sticks together. Now, the national Scout leadership is playing with fire. Scratch that; they’re playing with explosives.

Under consideration for a vote during a Feb. 4th to 6th board of directors meeting is a rules change that would overturn the Scouts’ ban on openly homosexual members and leaders.

A press release on Jan. 28 by Scouts spokesman Deron Smith said, “This would mean there would no longer be any national policy regarding sexual orientation, but that the chartered organizations that oversee and deliver Scouting would accept membership and select leaders consistent with...