In response to:

Karl Rove Vs. the 'Far Right'

Donjindra Wrote: Feb 07, 2013 11:30 AM
Bozell is right about one thing. Rove is no conservative. But neither are the "tea party" candidates. They're right wing radicals who are really John Birchers who think they've finally inherited the earth. And Bozell is no conservative. He's a radical, busy-body Catholic who owes nothing to America and certainly doesn't want to conserve its principles. He and his buddies may call themselves Reaganites but that doesn't make them one.
Dave8528 Wrote: Feb 07, 2013 6:03 PM
I consider our president a left wing statist who wants the Federal government to have total control of our lives. I'll agree with you that Mr. Rove is not a conservative, he's a moderate. But Bozell is not a busy body Catholic, he's a conservative that stands for the principles of our Constitution. We have much more to fear from the far left in this country then the far right. I don't think the John Birch society exists anymore, does it?
If I were launching a new conservative venture, the last venue I'd choose for the announcement would be the New York Times. Karl Rove has gone to the Times to announce that he has created a new "conservative" entity "to recruit seasoned candidates and protect Senate incumbents from challenges by far-right conservatives and Tea Party enthusiasts."

Rove argues that Republican fortunes have been ruined by "far-right conservatives," but he's shamelessly calling this entity the "Conservative Victory Project." Yes, and I could call myself Ray Lewis, but it doesn't make it so.

Whaddaya know? The liberal Democrats at the Times love this idea....