In response to:

When I Want a Progressive’s Opinion on What Guns I Should Have/Hunt with, I’ll Give it to Them

Don664 Wrote: Jan 20, 2013 10:04 PM
The clause before the comma is a secondary clause. The complete sentence that follows it is the meat of the whole amendment, and it says "the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." And by law, all able bodied males are in what the law calls the secondary militia, and they will be expected to show up with a gun. Please go back to 8th grade English and re learn how to parse a sentence. BTW do you know any conservatives who are anti-hunting? Neither do I. But every anti-hunter in the country probably voted for Obama. And all the anti-hunters I read about or know are socialists.
My buddy, Green Beret badass Bryan Sikes, shot a massive whitetail buck last week during our South Texas Purple Heart Adventure. He whacked said muy grande with a LaRue Tactical OBR chambered for the glorious .308 Win. round. Oh and BTW, Sikes used a high capacity magazine during this hunt.

For those of you who aren’t hip to the LaRue, it is a weapon that progressive darlings say we should not have because we don’t “need” such a weapon for hunting.

Hunting, according to these wizards of odd, is what they think our founding fathers had in mind when...

Related Tags: Guns Hunting Hunting Rights