Previous 21 - 30 Next
I do not know of any 15 round clips. Or magazines.
In the original poem it was Happy Christmas. Just to nitpick.
Wrong. Republican establishment leaders (aka the liberal wing of the party) believe they have the secret, and they have to figure out how to get an establishment candidate nominated against a growing bottom up tea party. They as elitist as any democrat.
Would someone define "soft power," for me? Do we issue the military nerf guns?
In response to:

A Reply to Rush Limbaugh

Don664 Wrote: Dec 09, 2014 9:42 AM
Having seen the Republican leadership cave to Obama and the democrats, time after time after time, you still say that they want smaller government? Bah! Rush is right on this one, and you are wrong. I answered the phone for the local Republican party hq in 2012, and I don't know how many people called me and said they couldn't vote for Obama, but they wouldn't vote for Romney. So they stayed home. In enough numbers to lose to Obama.
No one (with the possible exceptions of early Christianity and the Pilgrims the first year) as lived under Communism which is an absence of government which has "withered away." Reason. The "Dictatorship of the Proletariat," never relinquishes power. Nor will it willingly. KYPD
In response to:

War Clouds

Don664 Wrote: Dec 03, 2014 3:58 PM
Crushing debt? 2000, US Debt $5,647,178,209,886.86. 2008, $10,024,724,896,912.49. Almost double! But it took us 233 years to get to $5 trillion dollars. It took us 8 years to get to $10 trillion dollars. 2014, December $18,000,000,000,000.00. 6 years to get to $18 trillion. All the other presidents in history plus Bush is only $2 trillion dollars more than $8 trillion. Bush averaged $650 billion a year in new debt. Obama and the democrats have averaged $2.250 trillion a year in new debt. Bush was bad, yes. But Obama, who said $5 trillion in 8 years was "unpatriotic," must be trying for treasonous. Crushing debt? Ask your golden boy.
In response to:

War Clouds

Don664 Wrote: Dec 03, 2014 3:45 PM
What democratic free market West?
That's what DWinch said.
That's what DWinch said.
In response to:

Time to Fess Up

Don664 Wrote: Dec 02, 2014 9:29 AM
1. Why? As long as the democrat party is socialist, why? If the democrat party is to survive, it must be as a party that is not socialist. And liberal as it is defined today, is just socialist lite. 2. The RINOs didn't do it, the Tea Party grew up, and started putting better candidates on the ballot. We're not there yet, but the party is more conservative now. Now all we have to do is convince the kool aid drinkers.
Previous 21 - 30 Next