Good list, but Liberals are shameless, so it is almost impossible to embarrass them.

The GOP only has the House, which has passed over 30 bills (many to help with jobs), but the Senate under Harry the Democrat has those bills in the trash. The House cannot force the Senate or the President to do anything. Over three years and counting now the Senate has not passed a budget required by law. That's where the Congress is. We must win the White House, the Senate and hold the house in order to get control.

It's always the lesser of two evils. The lesser implies there is a greater evil. O will continue to destroy the economy, so that makes him the greater evil in this case. At this point, it's going to be O or Mitt. To vote for someone else or not vote is a waste and a "vote" for O. One of the two will the elected. The greater evil is worse than the lesser so that means the lesser is better. Mitt is not my first choice, but I plan to voter him the lesser=better.

It's always the lesser of two evils. OK, the lesser implies that there is a greater evil. It's clear that O wants to do more to hurt the economy. Mitt (not my first choice) will do the opposite. The lesser evil is also the better of the two. As it stands now, O or Mitt will be Pres and any other choice is impossible, so the lesser is the better - a vote for Mitt does not require total agreement, but that I realize it's O or Mitt, and Mitt is better.

There is no hope of better things with O. He has made it clear that he wants to spend more. Mitt it is clear will do better.

No difference in Obama and Mitt? He is not my first choice, but there is world of difference between the two. One will cut spending, taxes, repeal Obamacare, allow oil production increase, approve the pipeline, honor the Constitution, stop bailouts, work to renew the Bush tax cuts, support Israel, honor and build up the military, and work to save the economy. Obama would do none of these things, but Mitt would, so there is a giant difference. If Obama is re-elected, he will do the same and much more because he will not be facing another election. I don't know how long our economy can survive with Obama, but I have strong doubts that it can make with him another four years. Please stop saying there is no difference- it's a bunch.

I will vote for Mitt is he is the GOP nominee, however, This is a very poor article. It hardly touches on Mormon doctrine. They do not believe in the God of the Bible or in the Jesus in the Bible. For great info on this subject go to www.wayoflife.org and search for Mormon doctrine.

Corbett: The oil companies should pay no tax. First, only consumers pay tax, so when the company pays, they must charge the consumer more. Second, oil company products are vital to our nation's security, and prosperity. This cannot be over stated. Without these products, there would be less heat, electric power, food, building materials, and all other products. Everything depend on oil products. As for food, without fuel, the stores would soon be empty. Some other places people pay $9 or more per gallon for gasoline, and those prices and our own are mainly the result of government corruption. The difference now is that the President is very public about it - pushing for higher pump prices now, and higher taxes on oil companies.

Panda: great points. A vote for Paul is a vote for Obama = much worse than any GOP candidate. A non-vote is a vote for Obama also. We do need limited governament, but to support a no-hope candidate is a dream world of nightmares. If Obama wins a second term, there may not be another election. To say that there is no difference between the GOP and the DIMS is not true. The GOP is far from perfect, but also far different from the DIMS. Mitt is not my first choice, but if he is the nominee, I will vote for him. Some say he is no different from Obama. Let's see, Mitt has promised to to his best to get rid of Obamacare, cut spending, cut taxes. Obama will do the opposite and much more.

Panda: great points. A vote for Paul is a vote for Obama = much worse than any GOP candidate. A non-vote is a vote for Obama also. We do need limited governament, but to support a no-hope candidate is a dream world of nightmares. If Obama wins a second term, there may not be another election. To say that there is no difference between the GOP and the DIMS is not true. The GOP is far from perfect, but also far different from the DIMS. Mitt is not my first choice, but if he is the nominee, I will vote for him. Some say he is no different from Obama. Let's see, Mitt has promised to to his best to get rid of Obamacare, cut spending, cut taxes. Obama will do the opposite and much more.