In response to:

The "God-Particle" and God

Dogstar Wrote: Jul 10, 2012 10:17 AM
Would you rather believe in a God you can't see or angered by a God you don't believe exists.
traitorbill Wrote: Jul 10, 2012 11:44 AM
HeraldOfGalactus Wrote: Jul 10, 2012 11:43 AM
Atheist aren't angry at god. They can't be angry at something they don't exist. They're angry at people like Prager who insist that they're somehow better and more enlightened than those who don't believe in their god.
They found the "God-Particle."

That was the headline in many of America's news media. It turns out that the name actually derives from substituting "God-particle" for "goddamn particle," the original name some scientists had given the elusive particle. But the media adopted the former nomenclature.

Why?

Because otherwise, the bulk of humanity would not pay attention. Physicists went nuts. And no one can blame them. For decades, they have searched for the particle that may explain why there is any mass in the universe. And ten billion dollars were spent on the machine that probably proved its existence.

It is therefore not meant in...

Related Tags: Science God physicians