In the last week or so, an intense kerfuffle broke out over the poll-prognosticator Nate Silver and his blog at the New York Times, FiveThirtyEight. Silver, a statistician, has been predicting a decisive Obama victory for a very long time, based on his very complicated statistical model, which very, very few of his fans or detractors understand.
On any given day, Silver might have announced that -- given the new polling data -- "the model" was now finding that the president had an 86.3 percent chance of winning. Not 86.4 percent, you fools. Not 86.1 percent, you Philistines. But 86.3 percent,...












How could such a large group be so uniformly mistaken? That's not a rhetorical question. What mechanism led to an almost 100% failure rate? Unless conservatives can figure that out, they will never win another presidential election.
And they are still doing it. I've been watching Fox all morning, and all...