Dear Thomas, Check your sources and read others that you haven't read. You will find that Norris is correct.

I love i! Dennis has struck again with his solid logic and love of country. Indeed, we should re-tell the story of our founding as both an education for young people (anyone under 100 who failed to pay attention in class) and a reminder to the rest of us who may have forgotten what a great place America is. God Bless America.

Dead-on right, David. Republican conservatives are toonwell-mannered, trusting that peole will see what is obvious, while Democratsnhumiliate us, degredate our ideas calling them the same old thing or belittling a solid proposal that should be granted open debate. Dempcrat manipulation of the complacent media is sickening. This is what happened in the Third Reich. Silence the opposition by not reporting, not asking skeptical questions. Perhaps what liberals characterize as the same old thing from Republicans is really the truth. And, the truth doesn't have to be changed, just applied to see the results. We Republicans need to fight back and not take it politely, hoping for the best, because the best will not happen if we fail to...

The union's tactics sound like racketeering to me. The federal RICCO Act should apply. Department of Justice and Attorney General Holder, get out of the office, stop being partisan over enforcing the law and don't turn a blind eye on this. Prosecute it to the fullest extent of the law.

Before bashing Dr. Prager' thesis, consider this. Sacred means" sacrosanct, inviolable, inviolate, invunerable, untouchable, protected, defended and secure," according to the dictionary. This doesn't mean religion. All of these terms accurately reflect the veneration Americans should feel for their Constitution, even if they don't believe it to be God's Word. May I suggest to Prager's critics, that they read more about the Judeau-Christian principles of our Founders. Mock them if you wish, but the fact is the US Constitution is an extraordinary manifestation of those doctrines. It is unique in all of history, and yes it is sacred because of this. Like it or not, the Constitution is the law of the land, not just an ancient...

Coulter is right. Move the voting age up to 21. That is what it was when I first started to vote. 18 is too young to be mature enough to make a good decision. With the mass influence of blogs, internet and texting, it is easy to sway impressionable 18 year olds to vote for a cause they know nothing about. 26 would be ideal, but I do not think that will happen. 21 is still young, but it is far better than 18. And frankly, too many parents are hedonistic enough to turn their 18 year old lose on his/her own because it's legal (and they can go and enjoy their lives however they want because their legal obligation is over)l, when the person is still a child and needs more parental guidance and support.. I am an educator and a...

Well Ms. Pelosi and other progressive legislagors, Do you hear he sound of hoofbeats following you in the distance? Could it be those "Astroturfers" you disparaged and dismissed a year ago, accusing them of being violent> Take note. November 2 is closing fast, so enjoy your foolishness while you can. Your gig is up! A incensed and peaceful Tea Party voter.

Welcome to a free society. The First Amendment right of free speech is Numero Uno. We have endured feces and urine on the image of Christ, Old Glory burnt in public and President Bush hung and burnt in effigy: all allowable under free speech and supported by our leftist friends declaring their right under the First Amendment. Well, you can't have it both ways. Muslim sensitivities aside, burning the Quran in public is legal even if it is offensive. There is something disingenuous and hypocritical in Leftist complaint about this event, which hasn't even taken place. The First Amendment prevails, my friends. Take the message any why you want.

Ms. Dunn,
Bite me. You and the White House staffers who think this is a good idea are wrong. This solidifies Fox listeners like me and strengthens their case for existence. Since when is it fashionable to beat up on your critics? First Amendment? Free speech? Ever heard of them?

How about coming on Fox and telling your side? Who's stopping you? Mr. Obama says he wants open dialog and transparency. Is bashing Fox News the means unto that end? Maybe, you folks in the White House better rethink this one.

What a sorry state of affairs. Hatred looms its ugly head and the Department of Justice looks the other way because it's black on white hate. Hatred is a human failing that knows no color boundary. The Justice Department must pursue these cases. Instead, we get a mealy-mouthed answer of AG Holder and an honorable resignation by a brave DoJ prosecutor. Mr. Holder, resign. You continue to mess up, whether it is prosecuting these haters, trying terrorists or standing on principle to defend our country from invaders, foreign or domestic. Resign, Mr. Holder. You are a political hack.