Dread - Nice try at conflating and distracting from obviously disparate investigations. Clinton was found guilty of perjury, not getting a bj in the Oval Office. One would think you'd be interested in finding out what really happened in Benghazi, since Americans were murdered. Or maybe you don't care about that since they are not your direct family?

No Dread, this is about the preponderance of evidence that anyone with eyes can see: the WH narrative about the YT video was never believable and was a clown act to distract the public from the very beginning. Seems to me that "whistleblowers" were the champions of truth and justice - so long as those truths were capable of damaging a Republican administration.

RwIRwH -- That's the best you can do? You're a pathetic example of exactly what HH is talking about here. In your feeble mind, all that appears to matter is what YOU say.

So two of the first four posts are by dedicated liberals taking aim at a Republican candidate. Is anyone surprised? I'm not. It's interesting that, for liberals, it would seem that extramarital affairs is a resume enhancer and they fall all over themselves to get in line to absolve the offender and "move on". Jesse Jackson, Bill Clinton, Elliot Spitzer and any number of other prominent Dems come to mind. So, Sanford is guilty of a character flaw, has suffered for it, has made amends as best he knows how and has chosen (not forced) to run for another term in office. Does that make him a pariah forever? Stay home if you will, CPL, but that glass house you're in might become rather cold someday.

TL -- And you think that makes her electable as POTUS?

jean -- Seems you can't tolerate an educated, informed, well-spoken and well-reasoned person of color -- provided s/he is conservative in their political leanings? Face it, Sen. Cruz eviscerated her shabby bill and all she could do was resort to claims of "seniority" and time on Capitol Hill. Pathetic.

In light of this knee-jerk over-reaction by the school, I am surprised they haven't admonished the parents about the child's name (Hunter) and banned him from school until the parents change it, in the name of "sensitivity".

I don't know who I feel more sorry for: pathetic Slow Joe and his ill-thought-out advice or the ladies who were subjected to poor instruction in proper shooting technique from their guys. Those ladies are not likely to want to try again after such an unpleasant experience. Heck, start with a 410 shotgun!

When POTUS substitutes full-time campaigning for actual governing (in which he has zero experience and even less accomplishment), this is what you get. A thin-skinned rookie at the helm of our country who can't - or won't - learn how to become an adult and make decisions in which he's accountable.

sarabellum speaks gibberish and thinks it's a foreign language.