Previous 11 - 20 Next
In response to:

Why is Jeb Bush smiling?

Dobermite Wrote: Jan 07, 2015 11:10 AM
Jonah offers a warning in this column that every conservative best heed. If the right fails to coalesce around ONE CANDIDATE early in the process, the way the establishment will coalesce around Jeb Bush, just as they coalesced around Mitt Romney and John McCain and Bob Dole etc., then once again conservatives will be out-foxed by the establishment and watch in horror as they get THEIR GUY the nomination again! Its that simple, thats how the minority establishment RINO's out-flank the base, the majority of Republicans, conservatives, every four years ... without fail.
In response to:

Hollywood Celebrates Another Stalinist

Dobermite Wrote: Jan 06, 2015 1:09 PM
Best explanation I ever heard or read, its succinct and it hits the bullseye.
In response to:

Hollywood Celebrates Another Stalinist

Dobermite Wrote: Jan 05, 2015 11:08 PM
Incidentally Mr. Ryskind, your father was a HERO whom I'm sure you are very proud of. He tried to save this country before it was too late, at great personal cost. He did everything he could and more than most, and that makes him a hero in my book.
In response to:

Hollywood Celebrates Another Stalinist

Dobermite Wrote: Jan 05, 2015 11:03 PM
Exactly right.
In response to:

Hollywood Celebrates Another Stalinist

Dobermite Wrote: Jan 05, 2015 11:00 PM
Good Post, and very true.
In response to:

Hollywood Celebrates Another Stalinist

Dobermite Wrote: Jan 05, 2015 10:58 PM
Why--and here I am truly puzzled--does mainstream Hollywood continue to glamorize such hard-core Stalinists? == The left has to protect the narrative that McCarthy and HUAC were the villains, the conspiratorial bullies if you will, while the communists were not really communists, but simply liberals who were being persecuted by rightwing fascists, because it insures that they will never be placed under a similar microscope again, which might derail their ultimate designs on "Fundamentally Transforming America" to use Barack Obama's words. Make no mistake about it, we won the Cold War with Soviet Union abroad, but right here at home we were CRUSHED by the Cultural Marxist subversives, and I'm not speaking euphemistically, I'm talking about actual Cultural Subversion, specifically designed to deChristianize western culture, orchestrated by Marxist theoreticians (see Frankfurt School) and unleashed on an unsuspecting people in the 1960's & 70's in what we called the cultural-sexual revolution. This plot, which continues till this day in the form of political correctness, critical theory, multiculturalism, repressive tolerance, radical feminism, gay militancy, black militancy etc. must never be exposed, and the way to protect it is to maintain the narrative that the idea of Marxist subversion is a figment of the rightwing's paranoia, which if left unchecked can result in a return to the chilling days of McCarthyism, HUAC and the red scare, when poor, innocent liberal Americans, just exerting their Constitutional rights, were persecuted by their Gov't for being politically active liberals. Does that answer your question?
In response to:

Hollywood Celebrates Another Stalinist

Dobermite Wrote: Jan 05, 2015 10:56 PM
Why--and here I am truly puzzled--does mainstream Hollywood continue to glamorize such hard-core Stalinists? == The left has to protect the narrative that McCarthy and HUAC were the villains, the conspiratorial bullies if you will, while the communists were not really communists, but simply liberals who were being persecuted by rightwing fascists, because it insures that they will never be placed under a similar microscope again, which might derail their ultimate designs on "Fundamentally Transforming America" to use Barack Obama's words. Make no mistake about it, we won the Cold War with Soviet Union abroad, but right here at home we were CRUSHED by the Cultural Marxist subversives, and I'm not speaking euphemistically, I'm talking about actual Cultural Subversion, specifically designed to deChristianize western culture, orchestrated by Marxist theoreticians (see Frankfurt School) and unleashed on an unsuspected people in the 1960's & 70's in what we called the cultural-sexual revolution. This plot, which continues till this day in the form of political correctness, multiculturalism, repressive tolerance, radical feminism, gay militancy, black militancy etc. must never be exposed, and the way to protect it is to maintain the narrative that the idea of Marxist subversion is a figment of the rightwing's paranoia, which if left unchecked can result in a return to the chilling days of McCarthyism, HUAC and the red scare, when poor, innocent liberal Americans, just exerting their Constitutional rights, were persecuted by their Gov't for being politically active liberals. Does that answer your question?
In response to:

NY Cops Shame the Democrats

Dobermite Wrote: Jan 05, 2015 8:24 AM
Liberals are nihilists, narcissists and moral relativists, and such people cannot be shamed. Nothing would shame them with the possible exception of violating their own tenets of Political Correctness (aka Cultural Marxism), but that aside they are shameless.
In response to:

NY Cops Shame the Democrats

Dobermite Wrote: Jan 05, 2015 8:23 AM
Liberals are nihilists, narcissists and moral relativists, and such people cannot be shamed. Nothing with shame them with the possible exception of violating their own tenets of Political Correctness (aka Cultural Marxism), but that aside they are shameless.
In response to:

Anti-Christian Activist: God Raped Mary

Dobermite Wrote: Jan 05, 2015 7:58 AM
Just did an image search of Valerie Tarico ... 100% Bulldyke, the really really hideous kind.
Granted Younger, the text in 1 Samuel does not specifically cite Goliath as a Nephal, but the text in general, specifically the text that describes the Nephilim, implies that Goliath was indeed a Nephal. To be clear, nowhere is Goliath directly cited as Nephilim, but the text tells us that the Nephilim did not end with the flood (they were in the days of Noah, and also afterwards), so we know this abomination did not end with the flood, and everything about the description pf Goliath strongly suggests he was one of these hybrid beings. Agreed?
Previous 11 - 20 Next