What's fascinating is watching Krugman say things he knows isn't true and then watching his eye movements. Any good poker player could see when he's bluffing or not.

She just opened the door for the liberals to complain about the "makeup of the Court". This is where Obama will run on in July as the unemployment rate continues to rise.

Given the fact that this Administration allowed Castro's daughter to come to America and now this, people need to start to connect the dots. Throw in OWS and other liberal protests and they will see how the Democratic Party is being influenced by the Socialists.

Can we do this with a series called "This week in buried news"? This week alone could touch on the Wright bribe, the Eric Whitaker grant, the Catholic Church lawsuit, the letter about the new Obama movie and breach of security, etc. Once you start putting pressure on the media and force them to report the news will all Americans understand the true destruction of his Administration - Fast and Furious, Solyndra, Medicare budgets, by law, being ignored, War Powers Act, etc.

Now that Fox News has obtained three hours of tape from an interview between Klein and Wright, why do we need to attack him? He's given Mitt everything he needs. Instead of focusing on him, the PAC should focus on the media and everything they buried over the past three years. It will all lead back to Obama, but it will also neutralize the distractions they will surely create.

What's hypocritical is Obama's and the Democrat's response when Solyndra, LightSquared and other green initiatives failed. He said that you basically win some, lose some. This is what happened with the company that Bain invested in. The bigger hypocracy is that Bain Capital risked their money, while the President risked our money.

This whole argument can be reversed against Obama. The GOP can talk about the "green" initiative failures that Obama stated as "you can't win 'em all". One, Romney lost his own money, Obama lost ours. Two, Obama allowed his bundlers the first position if it went bankrupt. Three, Jonathon Lavine was never mentioned on the program, who held a senior level position with the company. Was he mentioned in the lawsuit? Why isn't he just as culpable? Why is the campaign taking money from him, if they care about the workers?

The President has informed us that he doesn't plan on trumping states rights. Are you telling us he lied? Or will he flip-flop if reelected, since this will be his last election? Or are the gays planning on protesting until they get what they want? How about we put it on the ballot in November and see how well it turns out? Funny how nobody is talking about liberal Californians voting it down last year. If put to a vote where all taxpayers have a fair say, it never passes. It only happens when Democrats get power and force it through their legislation.

It's not the trees that cause water scarcity, it's global warming. That's what the environmentalists would like us to believe and will continue to do everything in their power to make their beliefs reality.

Does anyone think the media should have done a better vetting job and announced his worth during the elections? Of course everyone is surprised after the fact and now they have to contend with a Limousine Liberal.