In response to:

Obama Likely Won Re-Election Through Election Fraud

djackson Wrote: Dec 01, 2012 11:04 AM
You give an address for a web site that is probably just as false or as highly speculative as what you are accusing others of using. Why don't you tell us why the idiot won. He is the most narsissistic, immoral dishonest President this country has ever seen . The man lacks any integrity, or scruples. ,He is rude, hateful and can be downright mean at times. He is vengeful and a liar in the first degree and the biggest problem of all is he has no clue what he's doing. The only thing he does well is campaign and he's been campaigning since a year before he was elected. Are you telling me that fifty three percent of this country is actually that stupid. And I guess I can assume you are part of that fifty three percent.
CaptainSpaulding Wrote: Dec 08, 2012 11:06 AM
Wow. You go to all of the trouble to reply without even looking at the link? That is lazy. The article is a cogent and well-documented refutation of the right wing's hysterical screeds about how they "wuz robbed."

By the way, have you heard about a single voter from one of the "Romney Zero" precincts who has come forward and said he voted for Romney but his vote wasn't counted? Curious.

There were many factors that hurt Mitt Romney and favored Barack Obama in the 2012 presidential election. The Democrats portrayed Romney in the worst light possible; as a wealthy, out of touch millionaire who wanted to return women to the 1800's. The left wing media predictably did everything it could to perpetuate that false caricature. Obama's race was an advantage; voters of all persuasions, particularly minorities, still cannot get over the allure of the first black president. The 47% of Americans on welfare were predisposed to vote for the food stamp president over Romney, wanting the free goodies to keep...