In response to:

The Electoral College, Under Attack

disecke Wrote: Nov 02, 2012 8:47 PM
Back when we had a Republic and a Federalist system, the EC took a middle ground on this issue by giving states a number of Electors equal to the number of representatives (set by population levels) PLUS Senators (always 2) each state sends. This gave bigger states more say in an absolute sense, but on a per capita basis, small states had the most representation. It was a reasonable compromise between the principles of Federalism (more power to the States) and balanced power based on population, so Rhode Island couldn't cancel out, say, TX.

As Tuesday’s election ticks ever nearer, my fervent wish is a solid electoral college win for Mitt Romney. Not to get greedy, but I’d like it in the bag before the wee hours of Wednesday morning.

I hope this is not asking too much. October’s poll swing and a broadening visceral sense tell me this election may not feature the nail-biting closeness we have been told to expect for months.

But if we are to be ensnared by a down-to-the-wire finish, get ready for the attendant micro-focus on the Electoral College, and the resulting debate over whether it should...

Saturday, May 25 | 10:46 PM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 10:46 PM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 10:46 PM ET
Saturday, May 25 | 10:46 PM ET