In response to:

It's Come to This: Sandra Fluke Nominated for Person of the Year

Dingbat36 Wrote: Nov 28, 2012 1:54 PM
I think I might nominate her too but the title would be a bit different. I would change only one word,,,,,person. In place I would use Rush Limbaugh's descriptive for a woman of "loose" morals. If her sex life is as active as she states, I'm fairly certain that's not all that's "loose"!

Apparently in the year 2012 all you have to do to become nominated as TIME's Person of Year is throw away your dignity and beg your neighbors in front of Congress to pay for your sex life as a 30-year-old adult child. TIME asks readers, should Sandra Fluke be chosen as Person of the Year? Definitely? No way? Below is TIME's description:

As always, TIME's editors will choose the Person of the Year, but that doesn't mean readers shouldn't have their say. Cast your vote for the person you think most influenced the news this year...