1 - 8
GOOD NEWS! Thank you.
In response to:

Bouncing Ball Politics

Dianne102 Wrote: May 07, 2013 9:53 AM
You are so right, Anglers reward! So, we have a government that is promoting RAPE, and PUSHING GIRLS INTO DELINQUENCY. As a p.s. teacher, I saw it all the time.
Well, Debra, I guess you know better than God.
In response to:

Is There Anyone Obama Won't Betray?

Dianne102 Wrote: Aug 20, 2012 9:32 AM
THANK YOU, John, for a most delightful piece. Would that things like this were on national TV each night....then maybe I'd watch national TV! :) I'd just like to point out what is perhaps the most critical difference between Romneycare and Obamacare: States may legislate in this area, the national government may not. Congress did it anyway, and that fact alone is what has caused millions of Americans to rise up to fight to "take this country back" -- under its Constitutional government. A rare event in human history, methinks.
In response to:

Hiding Holder's 2000 Smoking Guns

Dianne102 Wrote: Jun 24, 2012 7:18 AM
Thank you, Patrick Henry. I'll check out this website. Oh, and sorry that the terminally foul-mouthed liberal rewarded your work with their usual excrement. Guess their septic tank backed up - again.
*This refers to the citizenship of the parents.*
Byron, please go back to the Constitution and, with regards to citizenship, notice the phrase, "subject to the jurisdiction". This refers to the citizenship. Please see the U.S. Code at the time of Obama's birth with regard to a parent's conferring citizenship on a child: the American mother needed to have lived in the U.S. a certain number of years or she could not pass on her citizenship. Stanley Ann did not meet this requirement, either. For Supreme Court judgment on this issue, you can find explicit case law cited at Liberty Legal Foundation. We are in complete SHOCK over the inaccuracies and ommissions in this article published in the Washington Examiner.
1 - 8