1 - 10 Next
In response to:

The Meaning of Brown

Diane8 Wrote: Jan 22, 2010 1:30 PM
Wilson, still in grade school? All polls have to have a margin of error as we're dealing with humans and so many factors go into their answer. A +/-3 point margin is considered low. If you're dealing in statistics for a medical study then it has to be .0005-no room for error.

I learned that many years ago in Statistics, look it up.
In response to:

The Meaning of Brown

Diane8 Wrote: Jan 22, 2010 11:43 AM
It has now been over one year and Obama is still using Bush, i.e. about the Coakley loss it was people frustration over failed policies over the past 8 years. We had 7 good financial years with Bush as well as Security with Bush/Cheney at the Helm.

Did Barry forget that he was a U.S. Senator for 4 of those years (oh yea he only made it to session 173 days). We can thank his buddies from MA and CT for the Financial Crisis - Barney and C. Dodd.

Man up Barry, you own it now and people are getting very tired of that 8 year line. I'll be anxious to see how often you use that Tuesday night.

He lost a lot of people with his comments about pickups (from a company he owns no less). His condescension of those was heard...
In response to:

Nuclear Posturing, Obama-Style

Diane8 Wrote: Apr 10, 2010 5:31 PM
Obama basically gave a "screw you" to our ownly ally with a democratic government in the Middle East. Yet he's so concerned about American Imperialism and acts like a child when Netanyahu visits. Appears to me Imperialism is ok for our allies. Their building settlements in their Capital sets off Obama. He was nice enough to give HAMAS $900m that really stimululated our economy! It was his first slap to the Israel.

From Reagon through George W. Bush have always treated Isreal as an ally should be treated.

Good point on after a city is attacked with non-nuclear. No quick decision as they have to meet and discuss, retaliation appears to be something this Comm. Organizer is not going to do. I wonder if the terrorist...
In response to:

The Politics of Fort Hood

Diane8 Wrote: Nov 14, 2009 4:38 AM
I wonder if our angry FOTUS Michelle will take Mr. Guilliani's seat on the first day of the trial. Remember game 1, bitter woman probably hoping for an aquittal because these poor little guys were held in a lovely beach location and were not mirandized.
In response to:

Medicalizing Mass Murder

Diane8 Wrote: Nov 13, 2009 11:07 AM
I'm not a psychiatrist but I do detect a bit of jealousy toward Dr. Krauthammer. His story is fascinating (if you've ever taken the time to read about him). He is really a doctor, psychiatry; interesting. I'll take his 8 years of education in that field over what you have to offer. He also has degree's in Political Science and Economics; sounds very well rounded. So when Charles Krauthammer writes about this invented syndrome I believe him.
In response to:

The Politics of Fort Hood

Diane8 Wrote: Nov 13, 2009 9:56 AM
One guy supposedly tortured-3,000+ dead in the course of two hours? Can you even imagine the terror those passengers felt, those trapped, those who jumped from 90+ stories? You or I could be dead if KSM didn't give up information future terror attacks. We're at war and these people do worse torture. Remember these people beheaded 3 American's for being American now that's real torture and that you can see on the internet as they do it proudly. They will be 5 blocks from where the Twin Towers once stood...it's a very sad day for our country.

Obviously we disagree.
a
In response to:

The Politics of Fort Hood

Diane8 Wrote: Nov 13, 2009 9:25 AM
Clinton rerun. KSM is being brought to New York City to be tried in the United States of America's Justice System. Obama is giving an "f" you to the families that suffered horrifying deaths on 9/11, those injured and brave firemen, police, Port Authority.
In response to:

The Politics of Fort Hood

Diane8 Wrote: Nov 13, 2009 9:18 AM
Clinton rerun, access to the justice
system of the United States of America, Obama is giving major "f" you to the families of those that died on 9/11 and those injured.
In response to:

Medicalizing Mass Murder

Diane8 Wrote: Nov 13, 2009 8:06 AM
I take offense for Dr. Krauthammer(I'm sure he could hold his own). He isn't hammering the religion issue like the people such as myself are doing after reading his column. It is fascinating how the media "freaks out" if a Muslim is involved. His observation from a medical and a journalistic point of view about this new "syndrome" that was invented after the massacre shed's new light that I had not heard. Go back to watching MSNBC and bury your head in the sand.
In response to:

The Politics of Fort Hood

Diane8 Wrote: Nov 13, 2009 6:58 AM
I see the "is" from here is made it at the front of the web-site. I hope this will link now.

http://www.dojgov.net/Clinton_&_Terrorism-
01.htm
1 - 10 Next
Saturday, June 02 | 04:50 AM ET
Saturday, June 02 | 04:50 AM ET
Saturday, June 02 | 04:50 AM ET
Saturday, June 02 | 04:50 AM ET