In response to:

Obamacare Subsidizes Abortions for Women Making $90,000

Diane158 Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 5:03 PM
What kind of question is this? Why would this be morally wrong in any way? The baby gets to live its life, a family receives a child they want, where is the moral issue? Is it that she actually carries a fourth pregnancy to term? What is wrong with this?
amperro Wrote: Oct 10, 2012 11:04 PM
"What kind of question is this?" I just want to make sure that nobody gets condemned for putting a child up for adoption, even if that individual is fully able to raise the child.
How rich do you have to be in Barack Obama's America to pay the whole tab for your own abortion? What about a divorced 38-year-old public school principal who has three children and earns $90,000 per year? Would she need to personally pay the full fair to have a doctor kill her fourth child while that child was still in her womb?

Under Obamacare, the federal government will force taxpayers to help her buy insurance that pays for abortions.

Back in March, the Obama administration published the 166-page regulation governing the establishment of Obamacare's state health-insurance exchanges. A few weeks later,...