In response to:

The Chevy Volt: One Part Social Security, Two Parts Postal Service

dhellew3 Wrote: Oct 02, 2012 1:02 PM
(continued) that someday the property would be sold and you get your investment back. Meanwhile you are getting a return on your investment (rent) which equates to a higher APR than having the money in the bank at less than 1% interest. Without tapping into savings we have enough cash assets to pay half of the cost of the property and the seller will hold the 5-year note at a 3% APR. The rent will cover the monthly payment and we have enough disposable cash easily to pay off the balance in one-year. The point is, not understanding the simplicity of investments leads to misinformation and misunderstanding. Some invest in businesses, others invest in savings accounts. Who typically gets the highest returns? The job creators - businesses!

Georgia Boy wrote: Actually, President Obama has not raised taxes on anybody, but I think he will raise taxes on the wealthiest (back to historic levels) when he gets his second term. That said, Ransom is just another Rat-wing speculation, pretty much full of bovine manure. -France’s “No Limit” Tax Perfect for Zero

Dear Comrade Boy Georgia,

You’re right about Obama wanting to bring taxes to historic levels, although like most liberals you don’t understand what you are saying. Still, rest assured, if you did understand what you said about taxes at historic levels, you’d be for that too.

Related Tags: Postal Service