In response to:

Watch for the Anti-Catholics To Weigh in on the Papal Succession

DHE Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 12:10 PM
People can have opinions that he doesn't agree with and not be lefty, ill-informed or anti-Catholic.
Tired in Texas Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 4:29 PM
The "reporters" quoted above were supposed to be doing just that -- reporting. You know the old 5 Ws, who what where when and why. Instead, they were giving their opinions as fact, with no substantiation as to their assertions. They are acting as commentators, not reporters. These two women were ill-informed, and because of the contents of the paragraph on divorce, contraception, marriage of the clergy and ordination of women, would immediately be pegged as lefty.
badgerpat Wrote: Feb 13, 2013 12:31 PM
Right. But they can't make stupid, inane, non-sensical assertions like the one he quoted above, without being laughed at. There is no movement whatsoever within the Cardinals of the Catholic Church along the lines these two "reporters" have stated. The fact they are reporting this nonsense as news is the reason they are lefty, ill-informed, and anti-Catholic, not because they disagree with the article's author.

Because the Roman Catholic Church adamantly defends life in the womb, the oldest and most infirm and the institution of marriage, it has legions of foes spread throughout major media. Those critics will surface repeatedly between now and the selection of the new pope to use the occasion to sling their stones. It is a fun time, really, since they know almost nothing of which they speak, and their agenda journalism is of so little consequence unlike the MSM's recent interventions in the presidential election.

There are very good commentators on the Church and the proceedings at the Vatican, and they...