In response to:

‘Marriage Equality’ Spells ‘Marriage Extinction’

dhart Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 3:18 PM
I am still waiting for ONE example of how gay marriage affected JUST ONE couple's traditional marriage.
FlamingLiberalMultiCulturalist Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 3:49 PM

"I an still waiting for ONE example.."

Yeah, me too. I think it was you pointed out below that some nine states have legalized same-sex marriage. Why, there must be several MILLION heterosexual marriages suffering the resultant torture. They must be falling like flies! Surely the folks at Town Hall have amassed testimonials?
matthew466 Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 3:26 PM
they just don't like gay people
Beethovens10th Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 3:58 PM
Two of my best friends are homosexuals. Fail.
Beethovens10th Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 3:26 PM
Here's one.

It IMMEDIATELY changes the marriage certificate/application by neutering it. No longer can brides and grooms, husbands and wives be official, LEGALLY known as such. Language is extremely important. Homosexual activists themselves have stated so where they already have all of the effects of marriage, but want the word as well.
dhart Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 3:29 PM
Please. changing "husband" to "spouse" on the marriage license application has no effect whatsoever on the marriage. Nice try.
AliveInHim Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 3:36 PM
Yet ONE of those spouses IS by definition a husband, and one is a wife.

Nice try.
Jack2894 Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 3:41 PM
They can be legally known as husband and wife, but they do not have to be known as such. REgardless, how does this damage a marriage
Beethovens10th Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 3:57 PM
How are same-sex couples in California, who get THE EXACT SAME STATE RIGHTS as married people, damaged by not being known as "married."
Jack2894 Wrote: Mar 25, 2013 4:48 PM
Well, for one thing, thier status with the federal government is not the same

This week the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral arguments on two of the most critical cases of our time. On Tuesday, March 26, attorneys will make the pitch both for and against California’s Proposition 8. This, of course, is the Golden State’s pro-marriage amendment. It maintained the timeless definition of natural marriage as between man and wife.

Then, on Wednesday, March 27, the high court will consider the constitutionality of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), passed in 1996 with overwhelming bipartisan support and signed into law by then President Bill Clinton. It, likewise, secured the definition of legitimate marriage...