In response to:

Caught Red-Handed on Climate Change

dgreene Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 10:44 AM
Sorry but that won't fly! Why?? Because people who KNOW science, know how real science works! You can't HAVE a scientific position that's not proved! If there's no proof, then it becomes a 'scientific theory'! Computer 'models' are NOT proof, they're at BEST conjecture! I can write a computer program that proves the sun is made of helium! The problem with your position, is too many people believe science as infallible! And that scientists don't have an agenda! These guys get paid how? Grants from the government! Want your grant money, give us something to prove that pink is a man's favorite color! TRUST scientists?! I'm not buying that ANY scientists are ethical! If they WERE, why do we have GMO Salmon? Or do you even KNOW about GMO's?

A prominent global warming scientist, Peter Gleick, who was chairman of the ethics committee at the American Geophysical Union, admitted last year that he stole some documents- and he may have forged others- from the conservative think-tank the Heartland Institute. But that’s all in a day’s work for a work-a-day climate warrior. The important thing isn’t the quest for the truth in global climate research, but, as Charlie Sheen would say, winning. With winning comes cash.   

Because for some time it’s been clear, that in the climate debate, instead of actually accomplishing something worthwhile, all the attention will be...

Related Tags: Climate Change