Caver, It is difficult to understand why you prefer to blame, Coulter, Romney or anyone else for Obama's winning re-election, while in the same post you point out that "too many" conservatives stayed home. Don't make life or decisions too difficult for yourself. If your claim about conservatives not voting: You need look for no further excuses. According to your thinking: Obama didn't win, Conservatives held their collective breaths and threw the election because they could not have their way. One has to presume that you do not call yourself a Conservative. If you do: Are you one of those who stayed at home? By the way, I don't know a single Conservative who stayed at home: and, you don't either --- not any real Conservatives.

Hewitt has a problem predicting political things, caused by his presumption that his fellow citizens are by and large an intelligent lot. If he were to disabuse himself of that joke, he would prove to be a reasonably astute prognosticator

6501, Republicans have a thing about looking noble by admitting that their side makes mistakes too. Seem to think it makes them come across as being more upfront about things. Does absolutely no good.

Rick, Maddow's appearance gives no evidence of trying to hide what's "off". ... a bit puzzled, though, by your "good brain" comment.

Elanor, It's not just that he's done nothing but harm over the last four years; but, that the next four will be even worse.

Oops. Got ahead of myself there, Hunk. Didn't know you were aware of that: Seems you still haven't gotten it figutred out right, though. Seems to me that TH would have gotten that cleared up by now. They didn't just show up last week, you know --- been around quite a while.

Hey Hunk; I think that First Amendment protection of: free speech, the press, assembly and religious expression is directed at acts of Congress, not TH or other private enterprises. Just a thought....

JustMC have you not heard Romney’s plan for cutting the size of government? I have heard him say that he intends to do so through attrition, a prudent approach. People are not fired, adding to the unemployment roles: Their positions will simply not filled by new hires. As with all his plans, and I believe with all wise governance, he says he does not intend to do the job of the legislature, but, encourage them to cooperatively work toward solutions, something that can not be done by someone announcing even before election exactly what he is going to do. I believe it’s called governing with the consent of the governed.

If we lived in a nation of sane people Jessica, Biden would have lost the election in those same ten minutes; but alas, we're talking about an electorate who elected these two fools just four years ago.

The Benghazi debacle, truly an amazing disgrace, should be enough to cause any decent man to go ahead and admit that he has put his re-election ahead of the lives of any other consideration. The failure of Benghazi cost the lives of four Americans and we all know that the presidents first consideration was how he could spin it so as not to cost him on election day. Benghazi, though, saw the loss of only four American lives: How many lives would have to be lost before he would begin to worry more about those he is elected to serve than his own political future?