Obama doesn't want his daughters "punished" with a child for a mistake? He never taught his daughters to just say "No." The man would have his grandchild terminated. How evil is that?

The unborn of "Endangered Species" get more protection under the law than an unborn child. How logical is that?

So Schultz put on a great act, good enough to at least fool Jeff Jacob. While I rarely watch Schultz, but when I do, the man spews contempt for every conservative he talks about. Sure, Schultz may have said the words, but I have very little confidence that he truly meant them. Ed Schultz is a great example of what vile really means. Birth control is a personal responsibility. It is as simple as not having SEX, and cost nothing. So why is it that any man or woman should think it is a community responsibility to provide a man or women with costly drugs to treat a non-existing illness.

And that's bull s hit too. Many employers actually turn down college educated kids because they are 'over educated' in how 'to not work for a living'. Certainly don't need a college degree to be a plumber, electrician, roofer, or most any of the many constructions jobs. A big part of the Stimulus money was directed to infrastructure projects, i.e., construction. So get off your ‘College if for everybody’ horse. It's just a ploy by the Institution of Higher learning to justify even higher tuition and salaries. Most Professors are teaching because they don't have the common sense to get a real job, but they want more money for being employed for the propaganda they. Sure, what kid wouldn’t want another four, five, six years of...

To many college graduates won't take available jobs, because after a college education some critical, mundane jobs are just below them. They'd rather take unemployment and welfare before working as a ditch digger or lawn care. They are highly likely to become parasites in a down econmy.

How, by Government setting prices for the selling of Harry Potter books, by Government setting prices for admission to basketball, football, and all Pro Sporting events, and also the amount any one company can spend on advertising during those events. It's the Government's responsibility to make sure those millions of kids (and their parents) don't pay too much for those products. After all, the Government is subsidizing the kids ( and their parents), and now must control the prices because they just don't have the intellectual skills to know when they are paying too much for a product or service.

Who else "wasted" the Clinton surplus? (Can anyone PROVE Clinton had a real surplus?) - First it wasn't a Clinton Surplus. Point out that Clinton lost his Democrat majority in the House and Senate in his first mid-term election (Just has Obama did) The Republicans force Clinton more to the center, stopped HillaryCare, and reduced the welfare roles, etc. The Clinton Surplus (falsely identified) was destroyed by the Clinton era recession (DotCom bust), and also by the 9/11 attacks. Facts are the way to argue with that person! Though most liberals refuse to consider facts.

@ Wolfgang: Are you practicing the theory, that if you repeat a lie long enough, some might begin to believe it. You lie on your analysis of the TEA Party. You then posted a same comment repeatedly. Do you get a kick out of re-reading your lies, or seeing you name repeated over and over again. And yes, and educated person can refer to idiots as "morons", just a stay can logically call a spade a spade. The TEA party has attacked corporate welfare, we also know there is waste in the Defense budget. So it is clear you know far less then you believe you do.

Liberals are all screaming like a big spending college student that has suddenly been told Mom & Dad will not extend the credit limit on the already overextented credit card. Wasteful spending will not return the economy...it's just putting good money after bad! Extending unemployment benefits, paying a person nearly their complete salary, without producing a product or service, leaves nothing in return. If providing unemployment compesation is truly a stimulus...perhaps we should all go to the unemployment roles. Stop the wasteful spending.

Other than Paul's position to audit/end the Fed...I must say that there is little else in his rhetoric worth supporting. While I agree that we should be able to reduce our military presence in several areas of the world, that by now should be able to take care of themselves, but Paul's nearly universal withdrawal would eventually lead to total ciaos. Rand Paul seems better qualified than his dad.