Let me get this straight, Ms. Sebelius. The ObamaCare law allows you to solicit funds from companies YOU regulate, but YOU decided, after calling 5 of those companies, to discontinue the practice. So, either you do not believe that there is a conflict (in which case, why did you discontinue the practice?) or you do believe there is a conflict (in which case, why are you defending the practice?). You cannot have it both ways. Please provide a BELIEVABLE explanation here, ma'am.

Ans since Ms. Cutter came from Treasury to the WH to handle POLITICAL COMMUNICATIONS, what do YOU think her role in these meetings were, Pete? Perhaps, with her knowledge of the machinations within Treasury (and the IRS), it was HER plan to have IRS target conservative groups. Further, as part of the president's re-election campaign, it is not a stretch to believe that SHE was instrumental in obtaining and disseminating the ILLEGAL tax information of the Koch Brothers and Romney. As to what we are gonna do about it, I believe YOU are not so blind as to not see that there are Congressional Investigations going on now. If there is any shred of evidence the above scenarios are true, the1, is in a heap of problems. Then, I will happily say, "WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT, partisan hack pete?" Your whistling past the graveyard bravado is not convincing whatsoever, punk.

This group is too smart by half. We thought the Clintonistas were slick with their parsing of words and redefinitions, but the Obama clan is far more devious. If, and that is a big if, there is nothing nefarious going on with the multiple email accounts: 1) why aren't the accounts in the name of the government employee; and 2) more importantly, why weren't all of these fictitious accounts detailed to the authorities on the front end so that when FOIA requests came in, the accounts could be appropriately included? If someone has a legitimate answer to this, I may change my mind. Otherwise, I must believe that these accounts were used totally and completely to outside the purview of ANY oversight.

I would bet that the terrorists at Gitmo have better command of spelling and the English language than Superstud.

Poor typing - should be "exempt". Sorry.

Anybody care to guess what the tax emept status of CAIR is? MoveOn.org? And Media Matters is a 501 c3. Imagine that.

But the Council on American-Islamic Relations enjoys this tax exempt status. Hmmm.

Or, better, to enact laws that infringe on the Constitutional Rights of some religions to practice said religion without interference from the government.

John McCain whole-heartedly agrees!

Bingo, Jolly! That is exactly correct. I hope that when Holder is questioned before the Committee the next time, Trey Gowdy (the only representative with the stones to do it, and a former prosecutor to boot) puts this to Holder exactly as you have laid it out.

I wonder if the 88 employees include Lois Lerner, Doug Shulman and Steve Miller.