Freedom of Speech means we have to listen to him? Does the corollary also hold 0 that he must listen to us? Hmm.

The IRS is simply playing from the Obama Administration handbook. The laws really do not apply to them and when they are called on it, they play dumb, stall and attempt to paint the issue as right wing zealots out to get them. In this case, it is not washing and unfortunately for Lois Lerner, Shulman and gang, they will take the brunt of the ire. On the other hand, all of these scandals piling up at once are making the general public (ie Sound Bite public) take notice and begin to wonder if Obama is really the guy he claims to be. This summer will be interesting in how these scandals all play out and where the accountability path leads.

It can't be. It's not Obama's fault. But, Bush... and the Republican House! These polls are skewed - the Right Wing media is just out to get Obama because he is...... 1/16 Black. Yeah, that's the reason. He is 1/16 Black as he told the Morehouse students and he was raised by a single mother (err, maybe it was his WHITE grandparents that put him through a private school). These polls are just wrong.

Wonder whom Ms. Thomas' political donations went to.

GWB did not "target" liberal churches. That is a LIE. "Let us learn from this and how to prevent it in the future"? Really? Well, how about this. We have learned that President that politicizes EVERYTHING and demonizes his opponents fosters an environment in which these scandals are tolerated. Further, I have learned that if the Administration only pays lip service to the meaning of ACCOUNTABILITY, these types of incidents will continue to occur. Thus, how to prevent them in the future - only allow honorable, honest individuals to be elected President. Now you tell me how to accomplish this when handing out billions in freebies is the surest method to get elected.

This coming back before Congress will serve only to "burden and embarass" her? But, her actions, and the actions of her staff at the IRS, didn't burden or embarass the organizations that applied for tax-exempt status? Come on lady, you were a PUBLIC SERVANT, you need to come before the public you served and explain your actions. If you have something to be embarassed about, tough.

Get this straight - the interviewee was a trained MMA fighter. He did not have to be armed and was probably not. If, however, after being interviewed (aggressively) for several hours, he get upset and attacks the FBI agent, then the agent must protect himself including using deadly force. Think this through.

Let's just pray that the House has some sense and defeats this so-called "Immigration Reform" (aka "Amnesty For Most").

The statistic I like is that in the UK where firearms are banned, the violent crime rate is 4.5 times that of the US. So, if we ban all guns, we will reduce the 10,000 gun deaths to, let's be generous and say 0. On the other hand, if our violent crime rate increased commensurately to the UK's, we would have over 2.5 million additional violent crimes. Now, do you think that with these additional violent crimes that we might see at least 10,000 additional deaths (that is a death for every 250 additional violent crimes)?

Paul is backing Apple - or did you not read the article?