Interesting that Mr. Lead-From-Behind President would bring up the discord between Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland. Any knowledgable person would have known that the "violence" between Catholics and Protestants in Northern Ireland has been steadily dropping for the past 15 to 20 years. In fact, 2012 saw the least amount of rebellious activity in the past 30 years. So, why would the Uniter even bring up this issue??? What a putz!

And she HONESTLY answered the questions, raplatak. Unlike LIB's that will lie will the truth will work. "I didn't inhale"; "He's just a guy from the neighborhood"; "someone hacked my twitter account"; and on, and on, and on

Yeah, that damn Berlin sun. So, the fact that the1 cannot give a speech without using the teleprompter is not an issue - but the sun inhis eyes is? C'mon Chrissy, YOU can do better than this.

What I cannot understand is that no one in the media seems to be questioning Obama's contention that the NSA program of compiling our telephone "metadata" and our online activity is "transparent". If this program is so transparent, why did NO ONE outside of the inner working of the Federal Government know about it? Additionally, if it were so transparent, then why the hand wringing over the fact that Snowden has "leaked" information about it? Obama conflates an analogy of the TSA checks at airports, but this is so far off-base, I cannot believe Charlie Rose let it slide. The biggest difference between the airport checks and this PRISM program is that WE KNOW we are being checked at the airport - and even though PRISM is soooo transparent, NO ONE KNEW their online activity is being tracked. Duh!!!!!

Although, Guy, I see your point, I tend to disagree. Much like the DUI checkpoints, there really is no need to gather everything in the net and then sift through it to determine if someone is breaking the law. An analogy that most people will find abhorrent is the ability for the Government to stop any person at will on the street and demand to "see your papers". If the Federal Government is fine with casting a wide net via cell phone and internet usage "to be able to track down terrorists", then why the reluctance to profile individuals on the street, stop them and demand to see appropriate credentials? Basically the same thought process just a different "channel".

This is surprising? Obama had time for a Vegas fundraiser but couldn't be bothered with the "bumps in the road" in Benghazi. DO we need any more proof, folks?

Clapper says that this leak will severely hamper the intelligence community's ability to fight terrorism and that they have already thwarted one plot as a result of it. Well, la ti da. We could also thwart many terror plots by profiling certain groups of individuals - but there is a law against that. Just like there is this little item of the Constitutional Right to unreasonable searches and seizures.

Barrack Milhous Obama, meet your legacy.

Well, bring him back and ask him under oath.See what the liar says.

Just like Sebelius yesterday. Mr. Holder, if you do not believe that you did anything wrong in the reporter affidavits, why did you stop? Either you knew it was wrong, but did it anyway, or you still do not believe it is wrong. Which is it? Oh, and we would like your answer while you are under oath, sir.