In response to:

Liberals Can't Break 200-Year Racism Habit

dersen Wrote: Sep 28, 2012 6:53 PM
An Ind asks: "Cons should endorse the best person, not who the RNC picked when they screwed over others who were also running. What's the use of endorsing Obama lite ? Unless you're in a position, have enough-$$, that you don't need to worry about personal freedoms. The NWO-Wall-St-Fed-Res-bankers, CFR, IMF, NATO, WTO, NAFTA, SPP, NAU, will gladly take either Romney or Obama, So what's the difference, as an Ind-voter why should I vote for Obama-lite ? Why not vote for a worthy candidate like Ron Paul or Gary Johnson ?" I've some very good valid reasons why a vote for Romney and against-BHO is actually a vote for TP-Cons; Jim DeMint, Rand Paul, Steve King, Ron Paul, Mike Lee, Kris Kobach, Jan Brewer, Lbrtns, Gary-Johnson, J-Ventura !

Democrats spent the first century of this country's existence refusing to treat black people like human beings, and the second refusing to treat them like adults.

After fighting the Civil War to continue enslaving black people and then subjecting newly freed black Americans to vicious, humiliating Jim Crow laws and Ku Klux Klan violence, Democrats set about frantically rewriting their own ugly history.

Step 1: Switch "Democrat" to "Southerner";

Step 2: Switch "Southerner" to "conservative Democrat";

Step 3: Switch "conservative Democrat" to "conservative."

Contrary to liberal folklore, the Democratic segregationists were not all Southern --...