In response to:

Hey, Media, a $75K Mechanic Pays a Lower Tax Rate Than Romney

dersen Wrote: Sep 28, 2012 7:19 PM
An Ind asks: "Cons should endorse the best person, not who the RNC picked when they screwed over others who were also running. What's the use of endorsing Obama lite ? Unless you're in a position-have-enough-$$, that you don't need to worry about personal freedoms. The NWO-Wall-St-Fed-Res-bankers, CFR, IMF, NATO, WTO, NAFTA, SPP, NAU, will gladly take either Romney or Obama, So what's the difference, as an Ind-voter why should I vote for Obama-lite ? Why not vote for a worthy candidate like Ron Paul or Gary Johnson ?" I've some very good valid reasons why a vote for Romney and against-BHO is actually a vote for TP-Cons; Jim DeMint, Rand Paul, S-King, R-Paul, M-Lee, K-Kobach, J-Brewer, CP, Tom Tancredo, Lbrtns, G-Johnson, J-Ventura !
If "journalism malpractice" were a crime, Nancy Grace would not be able to keep track of all the trials.

ABC news reporter Jonathan Karl recently said: "Mitt Romney ... made $13.7 million last year and paid nearly $2 million in taxes. His effective tax rate -- 14.1 percent. That's a lower rate than an auto mechanic who made $75,000 in pay."

Not again.

Back in January, anchor Diane Sawyer teased "Mitt's millions" on ABC's "World News": "What Mitt Romney's taxes really show about wealth, taxes and fairness." Then correspondent David Muir informed viewers: "(Romney's) tax rate? In 2010, about 13.9...