1 - 10 Next
If there is no right to keep and bear arms for the defense of yourself, your family, and your community, there is no right to have them for the sport killing of animals either. The idea that so-called sporting purpose determines legitimacy is absurd: in order to be legitimate a gun's purpose has to be trivial? Hunters who bought into the sporting purpose lie sowed the seeds of their own neutering.
I just looked at a piece about this incident on the liberal propaganda site Huffington Post. It said 7 were killed in a mass shooting, and didn't say anything about a knife. Just another among many examples of the liberal press lying. The father of one of the victims blamed the NRA and politicians who obey the law by opposing civilian disarmament. Big surprise that he'd be the one to get featured on Huff Post. I feel sorry about his loss, but his statement is still very bigoted. What if someone's son was killed by a black person, and then he responded publically with an anti-black racist rant? It's the same kind of thing, except that the anti-gun bigot is far more destructive than the racist bigot. The biggest mass murders have all been committed with things other than guns. And the really big ones were all committed by governments, against unarmed citizens. The hands of anti-gun bigots are filthy with blood. The liberal press sells mass murder to crazy people by advertising it instead of just reporting it like a real news organization would do, and by turning the killers into celebrities. For this reason they are stained with the blood of the victims. This kind of mass murder is bound to be more deadly in a place like the People's Republic of Kalifornia than it would be in America, because in Kalifornia the killer's work environment has been sanitized by government. CNN lacks the power it had long ago. I don't expect a major gun control drive to come out of this. Unless the liberal press can't find something better to use to distract us from Obama's scandals.
In response to:

Policing Thought Crime

deprogramming services Wrote: May 08, 2014 4:08 PM
Thoughtcrime enforcement means punishing people for expressing thought that has been forbidden by the high seers of the liberal cult. They don't need proof; all they need is for someone to point a finger and yell "witch!"
In response to:

Policing Thought Crime

deprogramming services Wrote: May 08, 2014 4:04 PM
Class hatred has led to at least as much oppression, slavery, and genocide as racism. And all of the terrible things that have been done for both of those reasons were only possible because the victims lacked the power to stop the perpetrators. Civilian and other victim disarmament has been an important if not essential part of that dynamic many times. So why is even an accusation of unintentional racism enough to get a person in trouble, including expulsion, termination, and excommunication, but class hatred and civilian disarmament are not only tolerated but encouraged, by the same forces that treat racism as heresy? Thoughtcrime enforcement has nothing to do with not offending anyone; it has everything to do with despotism.
In response to:

Policing Thought Crime

deprogramming services Wrote: May 08, 2014 3:55 PM
Thoughtcrime enforcement is a manifestation of liberal dogma being imposed on America as an official state religion.
In response to:

Policing Thought Crime

deprogramming services Wrote: May 08, 2014 3:54 PM
Thoughtcrime enforcement, or political correctness as it's more commonly called, has been going on for decades, and is steadily getting worse. This is an example of evil triumphing because of good men doing nothing.
In response to:

Liberal Racism

deprogramming services Wrote: May 04, 2014 5:24 PM
You show yourself to be an indoctrinated member of the liberal cult with this post. The evil white male is not holding the black man down; the black man is holding himself down. He is being led to do that by the liberal cult, which uses him as a tool of political war, but he is still doing it, to himself. And until he wakes up and realizes that truth, his condition will not improve, no matter how socialist America becomes.
In response to:

Liberal Racism

deprogramming services Wrote: May 04, 2014 2:17 PM
Remember the Mexican-American organization called La Raza? The words literally mean "the race." The following link is to an essay about the group's racist connections. http://www.humanevents.com/2006/04/07/emexclusive-emthe-truth-about-la-raza/ If you include the fact that a very large majority of Mexicans in America voted for Obama, and their leaders said they did it because they put their race ahead of their country, you see rampant racism within that community. And that racism is not only tolerated by the leadership of the liberal cult, it's encouraged, and nurtured. Imagine if a group of white people formed a big political lobbying and civil rights group called the race, and if white leaders bragged that white people will vote for whoever is best for their race... This is just one of many double standards used to turn the evil white male (and his white consort) into second class citizens. I would add that the term white male is used far more often than white person when making anti-white racist comments only as part of a divide and conquer strategy. And that strategy, along with the overall strategy, has been very effective, at placing anti-American socialists in powerful positions in government, public schools, and the media.
In response to:

Liberal Racism

deprogramming services Wrote: May 04, 2014 10:24 AM
True racism is an ugly thing that good people should not engage in. But there are other things that are as bad or worse. Two of note are class hatred and civilian disarmament. Class hatred has led to at least as much oppression, slavery, and genocide as racism. And all of the terrible things that have been done for both of those reasons could only have been done because the victims lacked the ability to stop the perpetrators from doing them, and civilian disarmament has been an important if not essential factor in that, many times. The book Death by Gun Control chronicles some of them. So why is racism so bad that any hint of it can get you fired, expelled, and excommunicated, but class hatred and civilian disarmament is not only tolerated, but encouraged, by the same people who define racism as heresy?
In response to:

Liberal Racism

deprogramming services Wrote: May 04, 2014 10:14 AM
It's ok to be racist if you vote liberal and the racism is anti-white. For example: So-called affirmative action is government-mandated race discrimination against the evil white male. It's racial discrimination that it's promoters claim is for a good purpose, but it's still discrimination base on race. So the perpetrators can not claim to not be racist, they can only claim that racism is ok when it's politically correct racism. Over 70% of Hispanics voted for Obama, and we're told they voted that way because they were led to believe that Obama was better for their race (using the word race in a broad and common though technically incorrect manner). So they put their race ahead of their country. If evil white devils voted race first and country second they would be labeled thought criminals.
1 - 10 Next