In response to:

Why Jeremiah Wright Matters -- Still

Denmark Vesey Wrote: May 24, 2012 12:34 PM
"Obama sided with the indignant black Harvard professor instead of the white cop who was properly responding to a call about possible burglary. "The Cambridge police," Obama said, "acted stupidly." An undeniable fact is that the Cambridge police would definitely have been less agressive in the handling of the professor if he had not been an African American. The problem was not that he was asked to identify himself but after such, he suffered the indignity of being treated as a common burglar in his own home.
Jay Wye Wrote: May 24, 2012 8:21 PM
"undeniable fact"? WHERE do you get this nonsense?

The Prof made his own problem by not simply showing an ID,instead making a fuss,and police were SURE to respond the way they did..
DB07 Wrote: May 24, 2012 4:46 PM
We didn't realize that you were there Denmark. I wonder why the other African-Americans present didn't support your version?
mary1174 Wrote: May 24, 2012 3:55 PM
One of the officers was black and said that they had used restraint with the Professor.
Terminus in WA Wrote: May 24, 2012 3:44 PM
I'm going to prove your post wrong by doing what others already have: I am denying your "undeniable fact" because it is supposition. Have a nice day.
Joe1947 Wrote: May 24, 2012 2:48 PM
Ridiculous. Calling something "udeniable" doesn't make it so. How 'bout if I say "An undeniable fact is that Obama was born in Kenya, hates America, and is working as an agent for the Chinese"? Does the fact that I've put the word "undeniable" in there, mean you aren't permitted to deny it? Were you dropped on your head, repeatedly, as a baby, or what?
Milt37 Wrote: May 24, 2012 12:52 PM

Just because you have a belief, it doesn't make it either "undeniable" or a "fact". And whatever "so-called" facts came out afterward. The real fact is that when Obama spouted off, he had NO facts!

When a police officer responds to a possible crime in progress, he doesn't have the luxury to evaluate all the PC issues. A neighbor reported a possible break-in. The officer responded and found a person acting belligerent and combative. He had to handcuff him for saftey reasons. For all he knew, the guy could have killed the house owner and stolen his ID. Anyone like you who tells me about "undeniable facts" after the matter, when you don't know what you would been trained to do in that circumstance, is an undeniable idiot!
tuttletacoma Wrote: May 24, 2012 12:47 PM
wrong again ghetto boy

gates initiated the confrontation because he refused to act civilly when the police asked what the problem was

ghetto losers like you never will understand having an attitude always gets you in trouble

the old lame being "disrepected" that leads to violent confrontations among ghetto losers
Milt37 Wrote: May 24, 2012 1:20 PM

As much as I disagree with Denmark on this issue, I hate posts like your's even more.

Do you know if he's "ghetto boy"?

Your second sentence was all you had to post, because it's based on fact.

Calling posters names like "ghetto losers" just detracts from any intelligent debate.
tuttletacoma Wrote: May 24, 2012 1:30 PM
the day loser blacks like this idiot vesey climb off the victim cross and stop blaming whites for their failed lives, perhaps things will change

and we already know that comrade hussein and his flacks in the media continue to divide America along race lines

meanwhile the black panthers put a bounty on Zimmerman and yesterday the black panthers called for lynching crackers

and not one word from comrade hussein or his idiot pal holdem who has called whites cowards about race

I simply respond to vesey in the same language he has used
Milt37 Wrote: May 24, 2012 2:20 PM
Thanks for the clue about vesey. I kind of thought he was coming out of left field.

I still think you're wrong by posting mental diahrea like you do. As soon as you forget to start every sentence with a captial letter, as soon as you start using terms like "loser black", you've already lost your point.

I'm sure you have some good points, but if you just respond in an idiotic way, then you're just giving more credence to the liberals that all conservatives are brainless idiots. I refuse to let my emotions get ahead of my thoughts.
Rita117 Wrote: May 24, 2012 2:27 PM
Yes....True Denmark . A bad attitude will get you in trouble more times than not and mouthing off to a police officer is a sure way to get yourself cuffed. I don't care if you're black, white, purple or a green alien mouthing off to authority will get you an aggressive response everytime. Wrong again Mr.Denmark.That is reality.
Joe1947 Wrote: May 24, 2012 2:50 PM
Oh? "Not true""? You mean it's *never* true? And what has tuttle said that merits calling him a racist; oh, but I forget; it's a reflex defense mechanism for libs to shriek "Racist!" any time anybody says anything the libs don't like.
mary1174 Wrote: May 24, 2012 3:57 PM
true, not racist. And for Obama to act like he did showed such incredible racism that has seldom been seen from the white house.

In the 1967 comedy "A Guide for the Married Man," Joey Bishop's wife catches him in bed with another woman. As his wife stands at the bedroom door screaming at the sight, Bishop and the mistress calmly get up, make the bed and get dressed. The mistress leaves. Bishop nonchalantly sits down in the living room, lights up a pipe, picks up the newspaper and casually leafs through it. "What bed? What girl?" Bishop says. The wife begins to doubt her own eyes, even her sanity. Finally, she turns to Bishop and meekly asks what he wants for dinner. The culprit...