In response to:

Female vs. Male Senators

Demosthenes5 Wrote: Jan 08, 2013 1:43 PM
She's like most female politicians: use the power of the state via the manipulation of disposal, minimally franchised men IOT achieve her goal of establishing a "shadow matriarchy" at the expense of said disposal males- said drug cartels are just a inconcovenience distracting her from her goal of achieving this nebulous concept of gender"equality", e.g., women living government-subsidized, responsibility-optional, consequence-free lifestyles.
Emilie3 Wrote: Jan 08, 2013 2:24 PM
I lived in the Bay Area when Feinstein was on the city council. She had to make the announcement that another councilman had just killed the mayor of SF with a gun. She was really shook up about it, we all were. I think that is where she became leery of potential crazies using guns to kill their "enemies". Had he stabbed the mayor, he may have lived, but a victim has much less chance against a gun. In that same city, a crazy woman made an attempt to kill the visiting President, but he was too well guarded. I don't blame Feinstein at all for trying to do something about gun violence by crazy people.

As the son of a woman, the husband of a woman and the father of daughters and granddaughters, I celebrate the record number of females who are now United States senators. However, I do see some differences in the way these and other women are treated, depending on their party, policies and beliefs.

Diane Sawyer broadcast a celebratory report last week on ABC's "World News Tonight" on which she gushed about the "record number" of 20 female senators. Senator Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., also praised the Senate female population. Senator Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., said she won't be satisfied until there are 50...