They are "non-partisan" in that they began back during the Bush Administration- specifically to criticize a Big Government Republican like Bush the Junior.

It's called the "Violence Against Women Act" the most sexist piece of legislation in the history of the US. Equality to most women and their enablers is men being intimidated into deferring to women in all cases under pain of the prospect of jail, bankruptcy, etc.

Gender feminists have taught women-children how to use a paternal legal system & children (= financial assets) to turn their ex-husbands into peons in perpetuity. Why exit a marriage IOT find one’s self without having an ex-husband to pay all of the bills? I have seen this occur several times in my personal experience. I had a female Academy classmate (O-4 at the time) who committed adultery with an E-8 and then attempted to commit paternity fraud on her husband. What eventually happened? Nothing: Academy-educated women don’t exploit their authority & engage in group relations w/ subordinates. She later divorced her husband & got the house, kids etc. after making unsubstantiated “domestic violence” charges. Big surprise.

If “conservatives” are is pro-family, i.e. “saving” the institution marriage, (1) end “no fault divorce” (2) impose automatic “shared custody” & (2) impose mandatory “paternity testing” for all children born. Not likely, since they’re just as afraid of the backlash from the “Entitlement Barbies” as are the Democrats.

The “custody monopoly” favoring women also contributes to the divorce rate and by extension the so-called “downfall” of the institution of marriage. Serial monogamist heterosexual women (not pornography or “gay marriage”) have made the greatest contributions toward to the demise of the "institution of marriage" for the following reasons: (a) having invented "No Fault" divorce (i.e., women trial lawyers), heterosexual women apply for over 70% of all divorces; (b) women are awarded child custody at least 90% of time & use their children as financial assets IOT leverage the greatest amount of child support/alimony; and (c) at least 10% of all married women practice a legal form of polyandry, i.e., the "paternity fraud" epidemic, where "overt" husbands unknowingly are raising the children of other men, i.e., "stealth" husbands. If “conservatives” are serious about “saving” the institution marriage, (1) end “no fault divorce” (2) impose automatic “shared custody” & (2) impose mandatory “paternity testing” for all children born. Not likely, since they’re just as afraid of the backlash from the “Entitlement Barbies” as are the Democrats.

After reading your missive, I'm tr ing to understand whether you're being ironic or you are truly so cognitively malignant as to believe such Post-Modern, Marxist tripe. If the latter, try not to interpret history via a Marxist prism. Be respectful of white males, since white males invented (a) Free enterprise, (b) Republican democracy; and (c) the Scientific Method, which resulted in the fact that white males have invented and/or discovered 99.99 % everything of any real value in the last 300 years. This in direct contrast to the rest of the world, e.g., Sub-Saharan Africa, whose inhabitants never had the need, capability, etc. to develop their own organic alphabet nor system of mathematics.

Mr. Hanson failed to mention that thanks to modern medicine sparing women the vagaries of childbirth, i.e., at the turn of the 19th century it was “normal” for men to live seven or more years on average than women due to deaths associated w/ child birth; and the fact that men still dominate the 20 most dangerous professions, work 90% of all overtime and suffer 95% of all workplace fatalities which leads to women living an average of seven (7) years longer than men. Hence, if society was truly fair vice being de facto Matriarchal, the SS retirement age for women would be raised to reflect their “protected” status. Why not? Because female-chauvinists and their enablers don’t want real gender equality, not when men can continue to be “expendable serfs” doing all of the heavy lifting which makes modern US Society possible.

Said "hippies and freaks" are now respected members of the Progressive Democrat Party's senior leadership, e.g., 60" terrorist BIll Ayers is now a respected educator/mentor to BHO.

Since the Left can't (a) win the war of ideas; and (b) solely control the "machine" that creates the "narrative", e.g., Fox News, they invariably fall back to their Fascist methodologies IOT marginalize/silence the oppostion, e.g., College Campus Hate Speach Codes, the "Fairness Doctrine" applied solely to the "new" Media, and now the use of the IRS, OSHA, EPA and FBI to intimidate/silence conservatives.

DonaldH, So when D. Sanger of the New York Times leaked info about US cyber malware-related activities at behest of the POTUS and his National Security Advisor, that was OK because he was functioning a shill for the BHO admninistration? The real issue is the "selective enforcement" of said 1911 Law by the BHO regime, e.g., their focus on Fox News.

Enslaved women? Reality: there’s the matter of a man’s financial responsibilities in contrast to the many rights of women: American women bring about over 70% of divorce actions (the “No-Fault” Divorce legal movement was started by the National Association of Women Lawyers in 1960), have children out of wedlock at least 37% of the time, and are invariably “entitled” to earned-income tax credits, subsidized housing, welfare, food stamps, Medicaid, child custody, child support, alimony, etc. at the expense of the mostly male federal income tax payer base, ex-boyfriends & ex-husbands. I’m reminded every tax season that as a taxpayer, I am personally subsidizing the squalid lifestyles of a number of single-mother welfare households. Then there are the men are being held in prison indefinitely after not paying court-ordered child support, despite the anti-peonage provision of the 13th Amendment. Then there’s the ex-husband, who despite the fact that he plays by the rules, has to pay child support for a child that isn’t biologically his because his wife decided to commit the most despicable & widespread form of domestic abuse: Paternity fraud. Apparently quite few women prefer viewing their husbands as ambulatory wallets vice sperm donor- some statistics cite 10% of all U.S. births, depending upon the woman’s socio-economic, ethnic & education background. When some female commits paternity fraud she is saying to her spouse: all you are to me is an ambulatory wallet whose life I will control (like a rapist) for the next 18 years. Imagine giving another person control of your body against your will for 18 YEARS? It costs an average of $250K to raise a child. Men routinely work themselves to death to support their families. They are willing to do so if they have little copies of themselves back home. It’s call “vicarious immortality.” These women are “life rapists” and should be treated accordingly. Unfortunately, society views this type of domestic abuse as a “private matter” between a wife and her husband. Guess which gender is truly enslaved?