Actually, I think that said gun sales are directly in proportion to the anticipated negative reaction of blacks to BHO's re-election failure- let the riots begin!!!

Wotan as of Wotan clan? Great irony: scion of a group of semi- literate modern aborigines combined w/ the Nordic legend- generated by a culture that actually produced an alphabet vice it's Sub-Saharan African counterparts.

Wotan... So you are either just another hyphenated-American faux intellectual enabling/apologizing for hyphenated-American racism or just another self-loathing white male. Either way you just ambulatory pathology whose ignorance can be measured in terms of parsecs. Please don't reproduce.

Is anyone besides me struck by the irony in that the BHO regime chose the same name, "Julia", as one of the two (2) protagonists in Orwell's "1984"? Calculated cynicism or Freudian slip?

... child custody monopoly, etc. What a fine society radical feminists and their duplicitous self-loathing males with their misdirected sense of chivalry have created for the minimallyfranchised, expendable male taxpayer. The clear majority of income/opportunity redistribution is male to female. Sounds like a "Woman's world" to me.

The “Julia” campaign merely reflects American Society's slavish preoccupation with its main post-modern domestic policy: providing for the emotional, physical, financial & responsibility-free well-being of the “protected gender”: artificially enhanced lifespan, no-fault divorce (i.e., alimony, child support, child custody, etc.), affirmative action/quotas, Female-only technical scholarships (e.g. Intel), VAWA, welfare state, Title IX, taxpayer-funded abortion on demand in perpetuity. Plus the aforementioned progressive taxation system (top 50% (majority=MEN) pay 96% of all income taxes) has been put in place by the Democrat party that penalizes men while financing said female-centric welfare state, abortion industry, divorce industry...

... peon taxpayer population. These are the women who got BHO elected President and he continues to cater to said demographic group.

author of the book "Freedomnomics", went back to the 1980s to see what happens when women get the right to vote. His findings? In every single case, when women were granted a franchise at age 18, the cost of government immediately raised as women, particularly single women, started voting for the candidates who would create more government entitlement programs designed to provide women with security at the expense of the mostly white male progressive income taxpayer base. The Obama Administration the latest in a long line of politicians, i.e., “gynocrats”, pandering to the de facto rulers of modern American Society: single & divorced women who expect responsibility-optional, consequence-free life styles subsidized by the majority-male...

I have never heard a feminist acknowledge that most modern women (i.e., the "Julia" archetype)are by nature afraid and most literally depend on a paternal government to protect them from everything, from the men in their lives (i.e., Violence Against Women Act) to the right to defy reason, logic and personal responsibility (e.g., Affirmative Action, No-Fault Divorce, Abortions on Demand, etc.). The relationship between feminism (i.e., female-chauvinism) and big government and the promotion of every leftwing cause should be obvious due to the weaker sex’s natural and apparent fear of everything & perpetual need for “security” in all facets of their respective lives. This is of course reflected in how they vote. Economist John Lott,...

... and is willing to give them the handouts they desperately need? Still overseeing/enabaling/advocating the perpetual "plantation" I see?