And all of a sudden, it will be all Mitt Romney's fault. If the democrats could blame Bush for their 2007-2008 spending. legislation and lack of regulating FM & FM, heck, the sky is the limit. On 1-21-13 the real unemployment number will make a mysterious entrance at 14% and inflation, homelessness, etc will be the topic of the day for Wolf Blitzed and Maddow and the gang of idiots. Charles is the only sain one on Cavuto - Saturday am

The subject of this article will execute so many Executive Orders, we all will be mad Not only pardons, he will go crazy. EPA regs, Flukes, immigration and single payer. But then after 1-20-13, our Govt will have to contend with his spies in every corner of the halls.

What what - every time a Repub says something a democrap does not like and is called out by the rock throwers, we should jump to. Who sets the rules here ? Go chase your own tail, will ya.

Nope - you make too much sense, But many buy the mantra of the 1%

On the nice guy track - only if one kisses his as" with money. Obama used the Chicago newspapers to dig up dirt on opponents, used the IRS to go after a Romney supporter, dug up dirt on Cain, called out an institution out during an otherwise dignified event, slams people who disagrees with him, stole from Chrysler bond holders, calls Romney a murderer & a felon, says the pvt sector is fine, while transferring money to unions and develops a panel of his cronies to decide whether people live or die. Yeah nice guy. ,

Romney's personal side was shown, yet some wanted more. Wanted him to outline specifics of plans and at the same time they would say his speech was too long. 2 weeks from now or whatever the pundits who got what they wanted on the personal side will go back to the same mantra. He and his friends did a fine job introducing himself to America. His overall plan will be discussed at numerous stops in the 60 days and during interviews with whom ? more pundits. And for those of us with a computer keyboard; his web site. Just vote Republicans House and Senate; then we will see results.

As usual Charles puts fact to the circumstance, but some will argue with their meaningless petty tripe responses. Nonetheless history portrays results good or bad. Tax cuts on those who risk, without increased spending have always brought positive results from Eisenhower to Kennedy. The Regan rate cuts took longer because the dems increased spending. However Obama has been successful in bringing America down a few notches and wants more. He knows who pays the bulk of taxes and wants more of their success punished because its in his DNA.

Why do pick up the lspin from Hufpro or MSNBC and drag the sht to a site that seeks facts and truth, genius.

Everyone with a ntl voice or not has their own wants- Mit should have said this he should have said that. I like it when a so called semi Conservative mantra and runs with i. This one says he has to show his personal side, that one details details details. Dems say he did not discuss policy. Like his tax returns; give them a smorgasbord. After all Obama's policies are known -0 ax the rich, spend spend spend, regulate bus out of bus, tax cuts for those who did not pay taxes, by pass Congress and cancel previously written ;laws that were legislated by a duly sworn in Congress and president. ,No wonder Larry is on MSNBC or ABS or whatever.

The "god war" was turned into a worthless effort by the worthless man in the white house. As the struggling Dirty Harry said last night bring them home tomorrow. A war in which you do not fight cannot be won. Stop wasting the best of America where victory is not an objective.