In response to:

The Right Way to Combat Gun Violence

Delta Wrote: Feb 24, 2013 12:45 PM
Your suggestions make sense - but only if the crooks that we lock up are are forced (goodbye, aclu) to WORK while they're in our jails, the funds being used to feed, clothe and medicate the bastards. Thanks to the libbie/demmie/progressives, they get free legal assistance as well, all paid for by the taxpaying, decent citizens whom the crooks have feasted upon all their useless lives.
Tacitus X Wrote: Feb 24, 2013 8:36 PM
Agreed that prisons should be self-supporting, but it's no excuse not to lock up criminals. The costs they impose on society and victims far outweigh costs even at the most liberal prisons.

Public policy is a lot like math: No matter what the problem, the wrong answers are far more numerous than the right ones. This is particularly true on the subject of mass shootings and other firearms violence, which have stimulated a new fervor for barking up the wrong tree.

Many liberals think the answer to mass shootings and street crime lies in stricter gun regulation: banning "assault weapons," limiting the capacity of magazines or, in their unrestrained moments, adopting ultra-stringent laws like those in Britain or Australia.

But most of these ideas are irrelevant or impossible. Even if the...

Related Tags: Violence Combat gun violence