In response to:

Tax Rich Liberals

Delta Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 3:02 PM
How about breeders of more than two children paying THEIR fair share? Why should taxpayers underwrite the food, housing, clothing, etc. for these people when we're already providing free education, breakfasts and lunches (and soon to be dinners) to their spoiled offspring? Procreating should be licensed and ONLY awarded to working adults who can provide for their creations.
goldilocks Wrote: Dec 15, 2012 9:49 AM
breeders!

you think women are breeders?
James____Tx Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 5:24 PM
"Breeders".

Your entire post is just insane. Go back to your bathhouse and leave the real world to the rest of us.
SMyles Wrote: Dec 13, 2012 3:37 PM
We don't need more license's and government bureaucrats. Have as few or as many kids as you like. As long as they're the parents responsibility, not governments. Stop the government handouts. Cut spending. Make government smaller and smaller.

Republicans have been forced into a Hobson's choice of either letting the Bush tax cuts expire for everyone or agreeing to a tax hike on the top 2 percent of income earners (not to be confused with "the rich," who have already made, inherited or married their money).

If Republicans object to the Democrats' hitting job creators with a tax hike, three things will happen: Taxes will go up for everyone; Republicans will be seen as the "party of the rich"; and the inevitable economic collapse will be blamed on Republicans.

If Democrats were merely trying to raise...