In response to:

‘I’m Not a Sixth Grader’: Feinstein and Cruz Go Head-to-Head Over Second Amendment

deleeuw Wrote: Mar 15, 2013 11:11 AM
Why were Durbin and Leahy permitted to speak out of order, without first being recognized by the committee chair? Why was DiFi so defensive and, um, "passionate" in giving her litany of government experience? Why did Durbin start making references to the "Republican" committee reviewing Heller? And when does Congress deem a right subject to what it feels we "need"? Answer: the Left is all about emotion, not reason!
Luscious Lars Wrote: Mar 15, 2013 11:52 AM
Too bad the majority of voters in Illinois don't turn Durbin into Dustbin.
SugarLandSteve Wrote: Mar 15, 2013 11:57 AM
Dead people aren't well informed voters, unfortunately.
Luscious Lars Wrote: Mar 15, 2013 12:08 PM
Dohhhhhh! Good point. Neither are people who trade votes for cartons of cigarettes.They'll probably be dead soon as well. But there enfranchisement will continue on, compliments of the democratic party. We wouldn't want to disenfranchise any dead democratic voters now, would we?
SugarLandSteve Wrote: Mar 15, 2013 11:44 AM
Dirtbin seems to have forgotten that TED CRUZ argued for the Heller Case.....

Things got interesting between Sens. Ted Cruz and Dianne Feinstein today during a Senate Judiciary Hearing on the so-called “assault” weapons ban, which ultimately passed on a party-line vote.

Cruz asked the Democratic lawmaker whether she would consider it “consistent with the Bill of Rights for Congress to engage in the same endeavor that we are contemplating doing with the Second Amendment in the context of the First or Fourth Amendment, namely, would she consider it constitutional for Congress to specify that the First Amendment shall apply only to the following books and shall not apply to the...

Related Tags: Dianne Feinstein ted cruz