In response to:

So Fake It’s Real: Global Warming is Reality TV for the Media Elite

Debi34 Wrote: Jan 14, 2013 10:27 AM
Except that "evidence" is flawed. Temperatures are up because there are way more reporting stations than there used to be, most of them in urban areas where temperatures tend to be higher due to development, not climate (ever tried to walk across hot pavement in the summer?). The ice sheets in Antarctica are breaking up because of the pressure from the build up of ice sheets that are INCREASING in the interior of the continent, not because they are melting. Recent increases in temperature can also be linked to an increase in sun activity (sunspots). There is little true scientific evidence that most of the warming(or so called evidence of warming) comes from human activity.
Mother of 4 -- the original Wrote: Jan 14, 2013 12:06 PM
Not to mention the loss of a lot of Siberian stations after the USSR collapsed.
dschmitt375 Wrote: Jan 14, 2013 11:42 AM
I read several years ago that there are actually fewer recording stations. Stations in colder areas have been shut down and many of the remaing stations are improperly located too close to heat sources.

Here’s my challenge to all the global warming apologists:

Explain to me why the “settled science” of global warming has to manipulate headlines to make information appear scarier and more threatening than the actual data shows.

If global warming is so settled, why do you and your friends take the opportunity to exaggerate, obfuscate and slant every piece of news that comes out to make it seem relevant to today?       

You can see an example of this in the headlines below:

Climate Change Main Contributor to Corn Volatility, Study Says” writes Bloomberg-BusinessWeek.