1 - 3
In response to:

No Slam-Dunk For the Mommy Wars

Debbie178 Wrote: Aug 28, 2010 9:52 AM
You hang in there. I had to work when my children were young. We found a way for me to stay home (hopefully, this recession will end). I know its hard to not see your children for maybe two hours a day -- but, the time you have with them will matter the most and they will be happy to have it.
In response to:

No Slam-Dunk For the Mommy Wars

Debbie178 Wrote: Aug 28, 2010 9:49 AM
As a woman who embraced the feminist movement in the 70's, I realized that it was all about man-bashing (especially white men). I left the movement and accepted Jesus as my Lord and Savior. Having children late in life, I realized that raising my own children was the right thing to do. I have been criticized for my staying home with my children. My husband and I make it work (on $15.44 per hour) because we do not want anyone else raising our children. Our children, 18 and 16, our wonderful -- never in trouble and they don't roam the streets finding things to do that is not lawful. I know so many women who would love to raise their own kids, but buy into the principle that they need money to keep their kids happy. Thank you for...
As a former Californian, and have many family and friends still living there, I have watched the State of CA implode. Their fiscal policies cater to the unions and other special interests. I, believe, Meg Whitman, would be the right answer to keep CA from sinking into the Pacific quickly. I also lived under Jerry Brown as governor, for two terms, and he did not leave the State any healthier than when he came into office. A yes vote for Meg may bring CA back to life.
1 - 3
Saturday, June 02 | 03:37 PM ET
Saturday, June 02 | 03:37 PM ET
Saturday, June 02 | 03:37 PM ET
Saturday, June 02 | 03:37 PM ET