1 - 10 Next
That is a lie, MudontheTires...or more likely, a paranoid fantasy, lovingly imagined for the pleasure of getting that persecuted feeling without actually being persecuted.
No, you can also get your book on the shelf if it is competitive in terms of literary merit or quality of journalism or the demand for it is high.
But it doesn't have an obligation to put every book donated to it on the shelf. The library has a range of viewpoints. It just doesn't have Starnes.
There are plenty of books in the library by conservative Christians. Most donated books are not added to a library's collection, they would soon run out of room for all the books. It's not censorship to not provide shelf space for everyone. And looking for offense seems to be how Starnes makes his living.
In response to:

Neutering Religious Holidays

Dean197 Wrote: Nov 18, 2014 10:52 AM
Not just a religion, but a religion of first order? Maybe you should convert.
In response to:

Neutering Religious Holidays

Dean197 Wrote: Nov 18, 2014 10:52 AM
There's nothing in the law that requires the school to take this route.
What a lot of pessimists seem to miss is that these devices will be available to poor people as well. A general-purpose robot will cost less than a car ten years after it's introduced. If you can't buy one, you can rent one. Not to mention 3-D printers and laptops 500 times more powerful than today's. It's hard to fathom how CHEAP this much automation will make things, and impossible to predict how people will creatively make use of it. With so much intelligence, manufacturing capability, and labor at our fingertips, anyone could own the means of production. It could be the end of poverty in the sense of people going hungry or not having opportunity to reach their potential if they're ambitious. That may be optimistic, but historically, we muddle through about midway between utopia and dystopia, and the slope has been upward.
In response to:

God and the Constitution

Dean197 Wrote: Nov 14, 2014 11:11 AM
No, freedom from religion only requires the freedom to not be religious and the freedom to not have your tax dollars used to endorse or promote religion. It doesn't require any suppression. You are not specially entitled to play by different rules because your religion is currently in the majority. That protects you, too, because it might not always be so.
In response to:

God and the Constitution

Dean197 Wrote: Nov 14, 2014 11:08 AM
Not getting to use government resources to promote your religion isn't censorship. You're entitled to preach, you're not entitled to a taxpayer-funded venue and PA system.
In response to:

God and the Constitution

Dean197 Wrote: Nov 14, 2014 11:07 AM
And it's best for religion as well. It's not a coincidence that America is the most religious developed country while state-supported churches in Europe are vanishing.
1 - 10 Next