In response to:

Fact-Free Crusades

ddoright Wrote: Apr 16, 2013 12:26 PM
This article is not a dirty little SECRET. It is about an inconvenient truth. But is just one more example of Libtardism, the idea that people are basically good, than any evil the do is not THEIR fault, but that of the system, so the way to correct it is to put them in charge. Problem is, just like the religious nuts who thought Christ would return in 1848, when they are proven wrong (in the Libtard case, when the welfare states makes things WORSE - leading to gangs etc.) the response is that no, the problem was they were not given enough power. "Mend it, don't end it." When the new programs do not work , "repeat" . So if they pass gun control, and it doesn't work (like Brady bill), solution will be gun confiscation.
Raven7 Wrote: Apr 16, 2013 12:34 PM
I read somewhere the other day that perhaps we should ban and confiscate all spoons because they make people fat. We can probably find a lot of associative evidence for that.
restoreliberty Wrote: Apr 16, 2013 2:56 PM
We would have to probably expand that to just ban food. No one can become obese if we simply ban food.
Tommy_Maq Wrote: Apr 16, 2013 9:15 PM
We can fix the pollution problem the same way; No Breathing!
Amid all the heated, emotional advocacy of gun control, have you ever heard even one person present convincing hard evidence that tighter gun control laws have in fact reduced murders?

Think about all the states, communities within states, as well as foreign countries, that have either tight gun control laws or loose or non-existent gun control laws. With so many variations and so many sources of evidence available, surely there would be some compelling evidence somewhere if tighter gun control laws actually reduced the murder rate.

And if tighter gun control laws don't actually reduce the murder rate, then why are we...