In response to:

Congressional Liberals: This Fiscal Cliff is Pretty Great, Actually

DDelMonte Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 7:00 PM
Drugs? Ron Paul has said this is a 1st amendment issue. States right wouldn't apply. ------------------------ Now you're just making stuff up. You've already lost the debate.
Swimware Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 7:05 PM
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2011/05/17/ron-paul-hookers-and-heroin-the-2012-presidential-candidates-addled-take-on-personal-liberty.html
Swimware Wrote: Nov 26, 2012 7:04 PM
Asked by Chris Wallace of Fox News about his insistence that “the federal government should stay out of people’s personal habits,” and his specific opposition to restrictions on cocaine, heroin, and prostitution, the candidate claimed that social conservatives would nonetheless vote for him “if they understand my defense of liberty is the defense of their right to practice their religion and say their prayers where they want to practice their life. But if you do not protect liberty across the board it’s the First Amendment-type issue… You know, it’s amazing that we want freedom to pick our future in a spiritual way but not when it comes to our personal habits.”

No, you aren't dreaming.  This post is a virtual facsimile of the 'fiscal cliff' piece I authored two weeks ago, replete with many of the same discouraging bells and whistles -- Democrats reveling in their leverage advantage, public opinion polls spelling doom for Republicans, and no tangible progress on the actual task at hand.  If that sentence wasn't enough of a morale boost for you, feel free to read on.  Liberals in Congress, led by incoming Senate Budget Committee Chair Patty Murray, are ostentatiously demonstrating an insatiable appetite for fiscal cliff-diving.  Their...