1 - 10 Next
@William

No doubt, Ms. Bandes is possessed of the same quality of critical thinking skills exhibited by Stormy Daniels in deciding that she's Republican.
Bandes, you blew it.

First you misquoted the source.

Second you just dumped it in without any context or explaining clearly what was going on. Without going to read the original article, it's pretty meaningless.

Finally, didn't you ever learn that to actually write more than you quote? Come on, that's high school writing 101!

On the plus side, you're not claiming to be a conservative in this piece, so people might have to dig before I become embarrassed for you.
While I can understand promoting one's interest in a given candidate, this article is a promotion masquerading as a conservative article. It offers absolutely nothing of interest to conservatives other than "Vote for our guy!". That's disappointing, it could easily have been much more informative by detailing in specific detail how the conservatives in Colorado failed their electorate so spectacularly, and what they need to do in order to regain the trust and votes of the people. This article is an epic fail, Mr. Cannatti and Mr. O'Connell, try again. Please.
In response to:

The Advance of Bloodline Citizenship

DCSkepticc Wrote: Aug 13, 2010 11:04 AM
It's time to stop parsing the words and put an end to the sophistry games being played by the Left and being pandered to by the Right. The issue is very simple; Americans want an end to automatic citizenship granted to trespassers on the basis of which side of the border the child is born. Americans want an end to this loophole in the citizenship requirements which is being deliberately, criminally, and maliciously exploited by illegal immigrants to the United States. This is what the majority of Americans want. This would not be an issue if the Federal Government lived up to it's responsibility to protect the US borders, and since the Federal Government refuses to do this, people are looking for other ways to stem the tide. The problem...
In response to:

An Argument for the Flat Tax

DCSkepticc Wrote: Aug 06, 2010 9:55 AM
I agree that if we're to keep income tax, everyone should have to contribute their fair share. Should there be exemptions for children, or mortgages? One promotes the family unit and eases the financial burden of raising children, arguably necessary for society. The other promotes economic growth and personal prosperity, the American Dream of owning a bit of land and a house. I think both of those are good causes, but they're the nose of the camel in the tent; soon it invites the rest of the beast of special interest to follow. Better to get rid of the income tax altogether and return to a national sales tax.
In response to:

An Argument for the Flat Tax

DCSkepticc Wrote: Aug 06, 2010 9:50 AM
Agreed with the following caveat; a national sales tax MUST be accompanied with an abolition of income tax and the repeal of the 16th Amendment which is the one that permits income tax. Otherwise, Congress would be delighted to saddle us with both a national sales tax AND an income tax.
LOLOLOLOL!!!!!!!! That's great, too bad I can't rec it :)
Perhaps there's a major part of the issue; Social agenda. Does a social agenda of any sort of a place in the Federal Government? Food for thought...
He's suggesting the 'purification' occur during the Republican Primaries, not the general elections :) . In this instance, it's work-able. Come the general election, quite frankly, anyone who will oppose the current direction is preferable to letting the existing Regime continue it's Marxist march.
Write the Townhall web support and ask that the voting option return :)
1 - 10 Next