In response to:

The Case Against “Equality” Part 2

DCM in FL Wrote: Mar 01, 2013 1:35 PM
First: Fully functional hetero-couple Last: any gay couple (functional gay couple is an oxymoron) Distant second: everything else
Jack2894 Wrote: Mar 01, 2013 1:48 PM
This is a consistent response. It does show that you really do not have the interests of children at heart. You would favor an abusive alcoholic single mother with no education or job skills over a well educated, financially successful gay couple.

You do NOT care about children.

In yesterday’s column, I listed some of the benefits that natural marriage provides children and society. But some claim that promoting natural marriage exclusively violates the rights of people who are attracted to the same sex. That’s not true. The three P’s will help us see why.

The government has only three options in addressing human behavior. It can prohibit a behavior, it can permit a behavior or it can promote a behavior—the three P’s.

Our laws prohibit sexual relationships such as polygamy, incest and pedophilia. They permit homosexual relationships and non-marital heterosexual relationships. And due to the immense...