In response to:

The Case Against “Equality”

DCM in FL Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 8:35 AM
"Marriage equality" means everyone is held to the same standards regarding marriage: you may marry a consenting adult of the opposite sex who is not too closely related & who is not currently already married. If you want anything besides that, you do not want equality. You want to be exempted from one of the requirements while being treated as if you meet all of them.
Beethovens10th Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 8:41 AM
Not only that, DCM, homosexuals want to remake marriage, by their own admission, into a new structure, free of the "outdated" notions like sexual fidelity. Yes, this is a stated goal, easily supported with 5 seconds of Internet research.
DCM in FL Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 9:05 AM
"'outdated' notions like sexual fidelity"

"Monogamous homosexual" is an oxymoron, and anyone who doesn't know that can't claim to know much about homosexuality.

Anyone beg to differ? Then, tell me:
What sexual boundaries do you think homosexuals should stay within?
What sexual boundaries do you think they generally actually stay within?
How many homosexual relationships do you know of where the parties dated non-sexually for, say, a year before becoming sexually active?
Tinsldr2 Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 9:31 AM
I am 50 and Other then my parents and some people their age, I dont know ANY Adults that dated non-sexually for, say, a year before becoming sexually active?.

DCM in FL Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 9:34 AM
"I dont know ANY Adults that dated non-sexually for, say, a year before becoming sexually active"

Really? Well, most of us know plenty.

Doesn't sound like you've been around the kind of people worth learning about life from.
Tinsldr2 Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 10:47 AM
I spent most of my life around Soldiers, Guys that fish and Hunt, and everyday Americans.
Tinsldr2 Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 8:41 AM
Do you agree that in 9 states you can marry a Consenting adult of either sex?
DCM in FL Wrote: Feb 28, 2013 8:45 AM
So 9 states have decided to let people waive one of the foundational requirements of marriage? Then 9 states are wrong.

Sorry, but arguments that boil down to "it's become legal, so it must be right" are never convincing.

Pascal said, “People almost invariably arrive at their beliefs not on the basis of proof but on the basis of what they find attractive.” So-called marriage “equality” is attractive. Who could be against equality?

But what if the word “equality” is being misused? What if that kind of equality will have the unintended consequence of hurting children, individuals and the nation? And what if everyone already has true equality?

True equality does not conflate people and behavior. People are equal but their behaviors are not. When liberals claim that certain sexual behaviors are equal – or that all outcomes...