In response to:

Gay Marriage Advocates Lose By Winning

DCM in FL Wrote: Feb 19, 2013 7:34 AM
What continues to get left out of the discussion is the reality of what homosexuality actually is. It's not an "orientation." It's the sexualizing of some unmet need regarding one's same gender, and/or a rejection of the other gender. A person does *not* end up with attractions to their own gender unless something has gone seriously wrong in their lives. There are definite patterns to what kind of experiences can lead certain people to sexualize someone/something inappropriate. I've seen in people's lives what kind of experiences can lead to homosexuality, pedophila, porn addiction & heterosexual promiscuity. Homosexuality firmly belongs in the same category with the other things, no matter how much anyone pretends otherwise.
Auspex Wrote: Feb 19, 2013 4:22 PM
Hmm..I wonder what happened to me in my life that was so awful it turned me gay? Let's see, I wasn't molested. I honestly don't find porn appealing, and never have. Now, as a teenager, my friends and I did steal daddy's playboys and look at them in the shed when we were slick enough to get away with it -- maybe exposure to heterosexuality made me gay? And I never was heterosexually or homosexually very promiscuous -- probably because I wasn't one of those kids or young adults other people thought was quite handsome enough promiscutize with? I bet that's it, no one wanted to screw me at a young age, so I turned gay. Dang DCM, you've just changed my life...
du2 Wrote: Feb 19, 2013 11:56 AM
No matter how much someone who is ignorant pretends to be an expert on the subject such as yourself, this still is about a human being having the option to marry the person of their choice. Heterosexuals marry someone of their corresponding same orientation. It's only right that gay people marry someone just like them. The state doesn't restrict people who are similar or disparate. Two blind people can marry, or one sighted can marry one who is blind. It's UP TO THEM. Not up to YOU to decide.
This is between gay people, not YOU.
DCM in FL Wrote: Feb 19, 2013 12:47 PM
"this still is about a human being having the option to marry the person of their choice"

Like a sibling, a child, or someone of the wrong gender?

"Two blind people can marry, or one sighted can marry one who is blind."

Which, of course, has NOTHING to do with certain people wanting to waive one of the foundational requirements of marriage.
mulbery Wrote: Feb 19, 2013 9:21 AM
DCM there is nothing to support your nasty accusations. This world will be a far better place when dinosaurs like you are dead.
DCM in FL Wrote: Feb 19, 2013 9:45 AM
Could you possibly come up with a worse rebuttal?

I'm telling it like it is. You can't refute that, and it shows.
DCM in FL Wrote: Feb 19, 2013 9:51 AM
I merely pointed out the realities of abnormal sexual preferences in general, in a not unsympathetic manner. The falsest part of your totally false response is that those statements are "nasty accusation."

As I've often said, "gay" apologists would rather deal with 100 "God Hates Fags" fanatics than one person who non-judgmentally points out the truth.
DCM in FL Wrote: Feb 19, 2013 9:52 AM
"This world will be a far better place when dinosaurs like you are dead."

And I'll remember that the next time someone calls me "hateful" for merely telling the truth.
Beethovens10th Wrote: Feb 19, 2013 11:43 AM
The "gay rights" agenda has as it's core tactic entire populations "dying off."

Where have we heard that before in recent history?
naysayer Wrote: Feb 19, 2013 8:01 AM
Thank you for that sensible comment DCM. I've been saying the same thing.
Here in the UK I was involved with the Coalition For Marriage and helped collect signatures for its petition against homosexual marriage. Long story short, after weeks of urging the main organizers to have a conference to share facts with the public on homosexuality, statistics, research files etc., they used the lame excuse that they couldn't afford it.
Now after a very sneaky and hasty move by the House of Commons, marriage perversion is likely to happen here. If the public are given the opportunity to learn certain facts about homosexuality they would be a better position to make informed choices and lobby the government accordingly.
james120 Wrote: Feb 19, 2013 8:07 AM
well you know gays have babies,we have a s**t head in the white house!

Homosexual activists achieved historic gains in the November 2012 election in the states of Washington, Maine and Maryland. These three notoriously liberal states passed laws extending marriage benefits to homosexual relationships by four to six percentage points. But will these legal victories ultimately deny them the sweeping Supreme Court decision they long for?

Judge Robert Jones of a federal court in Nevada has laid the groundwork for such a conclusion. In his ruling on a lawsuit which sought to overturn Nevada’s ban on gay marriage, Jones wrote that the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender (LGBT) lobby’s success in advancing its...