In response to:

Abortion Strips A Woman’s Free Choice

DCM in FL Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 2:29 PM
Translation: ad hominem attack with no actual argument involved.
scrow Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 11:16 PM
"A quick one-liner showing the author's inversion of language should suffice. "

It didn't.
scrow Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 11:15 PM
You spent more space and time doing true justice to why you couldn't do the article true justice, then you would have doing the article true justice.
Basset Hound Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 6:51 PM
What's "misrepresented" about the Roe vs. Wade opinion. Even Bob Woodward (who is no conservative by any means) described it as judicial overreach.
Carl469 Wrote: Jan 21, 2013 4:43 PM
Translation: I don't have the space to do this preposterous article true justice. A quick one-liner showing the author's inversion of language should suffice. Among other faults, Kieffer's summation of Roe v. Wade throughly misrepresents the Supreme Court's majority opinion.

By the way, "ad hominem" doesn't mean "brief" or "nasty"; it's Latin for "to the person." As in targeting an opinion while knowingly disguising the identity of its author. Regrettably, we all know who the author here is.

The way to end abortion is to show women that abortion strips them of freedom. Abortion does not preserve choice; abortion pollutes choice.

Not All Free Choices Are Beneficial

Killing in the name of freedom does not preserve one’s own freedom. Women nearly always have the freedom to kill; they do not always have the right to kill.

Pro-choice activists tell women that in order to preserve their freedom, they must defend their right to kill their children. But the question is not whether an act is committed freely, but whether it is an objectively good act. If you freely...