In response to:

Which Babies Should Get the Death Sentence?

dbz77 Wrote: Aug 22, 2012 3:49 PM
To answer Jeffrey's question, apparently the babies of Tokyo and Dresden in the 1940's.
John5840 Wrote: Aug 22, 2012 3:56 PM
On a more recent time scale, the conservative "sanctity of life" movement seems to have missed the innocent people killed as a result of the Iraqi invasion as well. Actually, I seem to recall most conservatives thnking thatwas the greatest thing since sliced bread.
AlDavis2011 Wrote: Aug 22, 2012 4:22 PM
John 5840 I heard that you enjoy eating aborted fetuses, is this true?
gungy Wrote: Aug 22, 2012 4:41 PM
Yeah, even worse Jeffrey was the hundreds of thousands of innocent people FDR murdered during WW2 trying to get rid of Hitler and the Nazis!!
layopinions Wrote: Aug 22, 2012 5:08 PM
Respecting the sanctity of life doesn't mean you never take an action that could end a life.

Should the police only be armed with non-lethals? Should we never take action against terrorists unless they're alone in the middle of a desert?

Respecting the sanctity of life means that you consider every life to be precious. It means you do what you can to preserve it. It doesn't mean you should NEVER end a life; only that you better have a very good reason to do so.

We can argue about whether our reasons for past wars justified ending lives. But ending a life because you didn't mean to create it - there's not even close to a good enough reason.
John5840 Wrote: Aug 22, 2012 6:22 PM
What you are really saying is that when YOU think YOU have a good reason, its OK to kill someone. But when somebody else thinks that, they are wrong. How does it feel to be God?
John5840 Wrote: Aug 22, 2012 6:23 PM
I believe it was Robert McNamara who said that the allies had better win the war, because they'd be tried as war criminals otherwise.
Demosthenes5 Wrote: Aug 23, 2012 1:03 AM
And your President authorized said invasion when he was in the Senate. His current mishandling of the Afghanistan conflict continues to get men killed.

Americans witnessed a remarkable drama this week when some of our most exalted politicians frantically scrambled to reassure voters that they, too, believed that the United States ought to permit the deliberate killing of at least some innocent human beings.

They apparently did so to persuade the public they are caring, compassionate and -- above all -- reasonable people.

The drama started when Rep. Todd Akin, the Republican nominee in the U.S. Senate race in Missouri, expressed his view that no innocent human being ought to be deliberately killed.

However, that was not the only thing Akin expressed....

Friday, May 24 | 04:00 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 04:00 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 04:00 AM ET
Friday, May 24 | 04:00 AM ET