In response to:

The War Between the Amendments

DB07 Wrote: Jan 17, 2013 4:09 PM
If it saves just 1 child's life, shouldn't we ban violent video games?
Gene158 Wrote: Jan 17, 2013 7:43 PM
How come no one ever takes the time to ask him if some kids are worth more than others? What about the kids that are saved because someone had a firearm? Ask the mother in Loganville, Ga what she thinks about gun control now.
farpstabber1 Wrote: Jan 17, 2013 8:17 PM
I assume that you have already asked?
Ms Kelly Wrote: Jan 17, 2013 4:23 PM
Let's ban hot dogs. Five children per year die from choking on hog dogs.
poorgrandchildren.com2 Wrote: Jan 17, 2013 4:13 PM
If it saves just one child's life, shouldn't we ban automobiles?
Gilchrist Wrote: Jan 18, 2013 8:39 PM
Yes, the Obamanation's "rescue" of Government Motors is responsible for more child deaths than Smith & Wesson.

The horrific Newtown, Conn., mass shooting has unleashed a frenzy to pass new gun-control legislation. But the war over restricting firearms is not just between liberals and conservatives; it also pits the first two amendments to the U.S. Constitution against each other.

Apparently, in the sequential thinking of James Madison and the Founding Fathers, the right to free expression and the guarantee to own arms were the two most important personal liberties. But now these two cherished rights seem to be at odds with each other and have caused bitter exchanges between interpreters of the Constitution.

Many liberals believe there is...