My problem with Mr. Romney is not his religion. It is his campaign approach. It will be harder to swallow this time voting for him than any other "we have to run somebody" in the past. If Mr. Romney ran on his record with explanations, he may have a better chance of my support. The tenor of his campaign literature as it arrives in my mailbox is such that I cannot read more than a sentence before tossing it. Republicans ran "Centerist" McCain last time, in hopes of drawing some of the liberal votes. How did that work out. As far as I am concerned, there is no-one running that does not fit the "establishment" mold.

This is nothing but weak terrorist attacking their own countrymen(women). If they were strong, they would not rely on terror to accomplish their ends. They do not have the power of persuasion to get people to understand and support their points and win in the world of ideas. I do not say this of Muslims in general, but of the childish ones who have to break things because they don't get their way. Or,to get their way The followers are gullible and will attack their brothers and sisters because their leaders are too weak to lead in the adult world. But that is just my opinion.

This is nothing but weak terrorist attacking their own countrymen(women). If they were strong, they would not rely on terror to accomplish their ends. They do not have the power of persuasion to get people to understand and support their points and win in the world of ideas. I do not say this of Muslims in general, but of the childish ones who have to break things because they don't get their way. Or,to get their way The followers are gullible and will attack their brothers and sisters because their leaders are too weak to lead in the adult world. But that is just my opinion.

I was going to do a thoughtful response to this, about how Ms Charen is correct about the use of what is important to some people to encourage them to do what "I" want, but 'I' am not "myself" willing to do, but your rant is evidence that reality is a waste of time with you,

Mt Stone is a propagandist, but only referenced above. Mr Moore, as noted I in another response here, sits back and encourages people to act for his goal, but acts little on his own, much like Mr bin Laden. And in the end, I expect Mr Moore to hang on to his capitalism, and avoid sacrifice that he calls on others to make, as much as bin Laden attempted to hide behind a woman to avoid the "martyrdom" that he called on others to make. In that light, they are similar. A little thought beyond what is presented to us sometimes opens our eyes. But it probably does not pay as well as trolling. in a small world life.

To whom are you referring? Mr Bin Ladin, that hides behind a woman when it is his time to become the martyr that he has encouraged scores of thousands to become? Mr Moore, that has become not unlike the story he told of Roger, that launched his carrier - and - personal growth.Or, Mr POTUS? All speak of the evil of America. As noted above about Mr bin Ladin's latest dissertation, the stories change to get the greatest mileage out of the current buzzwords. bin Laden is not on record as killing anyone directly, but directing and essentially "contracting" others to do the work for him. He inspired people against others with his words to accomplish political change in the US and Israel, mainly. In the end he appeared to be a hypocrite asking...

Looking for the button that say "Flag as Stupid". Need that browser update. Most people looking for acceptance try to find as many others that they think are like them, so they don't feel abnormal. Just Sayin.

Alternate hypothesis 1 - The tribe did not like him and was sending a message to his survivors. Alternate hypothesis 2 - A hermaphrodite with male skeletal structure and female appearance Alternate hypothesis 3 - A woman with masculine hip structure. Each of these is of greater likelihood under such a divided social structure than - The hypothesis that has to be true to make the university PC - Gay.

Not your father's Ob-Mobile

The DNC did insert trouble makers into the crowd. Walker responded politely to a stranger on the phone. If Soros, or trumka, called and suggested that you go to Wisconsin and cause trouble would you say "no flipping way", or would you casually agree, then go back to your couch? I am betting on the latter. But then you may be young and unrefined and respond in the alternative I mentioned, but then you would never reach elected office.